Published May 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Imaging algorithms and CT protocols in trauma patients: survey of Swiss emergency centers

  • 1. University Hospital Zurich, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Zurich (Switzerland)
  • 2. Kantonsspital Graubuenden, Department of Radiology, Chur (Switzerland)
  • 3. University Hospital Basel, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Basel (Switzerland)
  • 4. Spital Wallis, Department of Radiology, Visp (Switzerland)
  • 5. Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Department of Radiology, Lugano (Switzerland)
  • 6. Kantonsspital Winterthur, Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Winterthur (Switzerland)
  • 7. Kantonsspital St Gallen, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gallen (Switzerland)
  • 8. Kantonsspital Aarau, Department of Radiology, Aarau (Switzerland)
  • 9. University Hospital Bern, Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Bern (Switzerland)
  • 10. Lausanne University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne (Switzerland)
  • 11. Luzerner Kantonsspital, Institute of Radiology, Luzern 16 (Switzerland)
  • 12. Geneva University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Geneve (Switzerland)

Description

To identify imaging algorithms and indications, CT protocols, and radiation doses in polytrauma patients in Swiss trauma centres. An online survey with multiple choice questions and free-text responses was sent to authorized level-I trauma centres in Switzerland. All centres responded and indicated that they have internal standardized imaging algorithms for polytrauma patients. Nine of 12 centres (75 %) perform whole-body CT (WBCT) after focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and conventional radiography; 3/12 (25 %) use WBCT for initial imaging. Indications for WBCT were similar across centres being based on trauma mechanisms, vital signs, and presence of multiple injuries. Seven of 12 centres (58 %) perform an arterial and venous phase of the abdomen in split-bolus technique. Six of 12 centres (50 %) use multiphase protocols of the head (n = 3) and abdomen (n = 4), whereas 6/12 (50 %) use single-phase protocols for WBCT. Arm position was on the patient's body during scanning (3/12, 25 %), alongside the body (2/12, 17 %), above the head (2/12, 17 %), or was changed during scanning (5/12, 42 %). Radiation doses showed large variations across centres ranging from 1268-3988 mGy*cm (DLP) per WBCT. Imaging algorithms in polytrauma patients are standardized within, but vary across Swiss trauma centres, similar to the individual WBCT protocols, resulting in large variations in associated radiation doses. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4574-1

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
27
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 1922-1928
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3