Imaging algorithms and CT protocols in trauma patients: survey of Swiss emergency centers
Creators
- 1. University Hospital Zurich, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Zurich (Switzerland)
- 2. Kantonsspital Graubuenden, Department of Radiology, Chur (Switzerland)
- 3. University Hospital Basel, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Basel (Switzerland)
- 4. Spital Wallis, Department of Radiology, Visp (Switzerland)
- 5. Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Department of Radiology, Lugano (Switzerland)
- 6. Kantonsspital Winterthur, Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Winterthur (Switzerland)
- 7. Kantonsspital St Gallen, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gallen (Switzerland)
- 8. Kantonsspital Aarau, Department of Radiology, Aarau (Switzerland)
- 9. University Hospital Bern, Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Bern (Switzerland)
- 10. Lausanne University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne (Switzerland)
- 11. Luzerner Kantonsspital, Institute of Radiology, Luzern 16 (Switzerland)
- 12. Geneva University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Geneve (Switzerland)
Description
To identify imaging algorithms and indications, CT protocols, and radiation doses in polytrauma patients in Swiss trauma centres. An online survey with multiple choice questions and free-text responses was sent to authorized level-I trauma centres in Switzerland. All centres responded and indicated that they have internal standardized imaging algorithms for polytrauma patients. Nine of 12 centres (75 %) perform whole-body CT (WBCT) after focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and conventional radiography; 3/12 (25 %) use WBCT for initial imaging. Indications for WBCT were similar across centres being based on trauma mechanisms, vital signs, and presence of multiple injuries. Seven of 12 centres (58 %) perform an arterial and venous phase of the abdomen in split-bolus technique. Six of 12 centres (50 %) use multiphase protocols of the head (n = 3) and abdomen (n = 4), whereas 6/12 (50 %) use single-phase protocols for WBCT. Arm position was on the patient's body during scanning (3/12, 25 %), alongside the body (2/12, 17 %), above the head (2/12, 17 %), or was changed during scanning (5/12, 42 %). Radiation doses showed large variations across centres ranging from 1268-3988 mGy*cm (DLP) per WBCT. Imaging algorithms in polytrauma patients are standardized within, but vary across Swiss trauma centres, similar to the individual WBCT protocols, resulting in large variations in associated radiation doses. (orig.)
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4574-1Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 27
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1922-1928
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 48053458
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ABDOMEN; ALGORITHMS; ARMS; ARTERIES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA ACQUISITION; HEAD; HOSPITALS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INJURIES; POSITIONING; RADIATION DOSES; RECOMMENDATIONS; STANDARDIZATION; SWITZERLAND; VEINS
- Descriptors DEC
- BLOOD VESSELS; BODY; BUILDINGS; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DATA PROCESSING; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DOSES; EUROPE; EVALUATION; LIMBS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS; ORGANS; PROCESSING; TOMOGRAPHY; WESTERN EUROPE