Legacy effects of temporary grassland in annual crop rotation on soil ecosystem services
Creators
- 1. University of Rennes, CNRS, ECOBIO [(Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution)], - UMR 6553, Rennes (France)
- 2. UMR SAS, INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO AGROCAMPUS OUEST, 35000 Rennes (France)
- 3. IFAB Institut für Angewandte Bodenbiologie GmbH, 22337 Hamburg (Germany)
- 4. UMR ECOSYS, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles (France)
- 5. INRAE, UR P3F, Centre Poitou-Charentes, Lusignan (France)
- 6. University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca (Romania)
Description
Highlights: • Five ecosystem services were studied in crop rotations with or without grasslands. • Grassland introduction improves soil structure maintenance and biodiversity conservation. • Grassland introduction decreases pathogen regulation. • Grassland legacy effect improves soil structure maintenance and biodiversity conservation. • There is no legacy effect on water and pathogen regulation, nor on forage production. The introduction of temporary grassland into an annual crop rotation is recognized to improve soil ecosystem services, and resulting legacies can be beneficial for the following crops. In this context, the aim of the present study was to evaluate legacy effects of introducing temporary grassland into an annual crop rotation on five ecosystem services (i) soil structure maintenance (aggregate stability), (ii) water regulation (saturated hydraulic conductivity), (iii) biodiversity conservation (microbial biomass and microbial metabolic activity, as well as microorganism, enchytraeid, springtail and earthworm communities), (iv) pathogen regulation (soil suppressiveness to Verticillium dahliae), and (v) forage production and quality. Three crop rotation schemes, maintained for twelve years, were compared in four random blocks, one being an annual crop rotation without grassland (0%), another with a medium percentage of grassland (50%, corresponding to 3 years of continuous grassland in the crop rotation), and a third one with a high percentage of grassland in the crop rotation (75%, corresponding to 6 years of continuous grassland in the crop rotation). The results showed that the grassland introduction into an annual crop rotation improved, whatever the duration of the grassland, soil structure maintenance and biodiversity conservation, while it decreased pathogen regulation and did not modify water regulation. Comparing the two crop rotations that included grassland, indicated a stronger beneficial grassland legacy effect for the higher proportion of grassland concerning soil structure maintenance and biodiversity conservation. By contrast, water regulation, pathogen regulation and forage production were not affected by the legacy of the 75% grassland during the rotation. Overall, our findings demonstrated the extent to which grassland legacies are affecting the current state of soil properties and possible ecosystem services provided. To improve ecosystem services, soil management should take legacy effects into account and consider longer timeframes to apply beneficial practices.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146140Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146140;
- PII
- S0048969721012079;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 780
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54057739
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMASS; CROPS; FORAGE; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULICS; MICROORGANISMS; RANGELANDS; SOILS; SPECIES DIVERSITY
- Descriptors DEC
- ANIMAL FEEDS; ECOSYSTEMS; ENERGY SOURCES; FLUID MECHANICS; FOOD; MECHANICS; PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.