Published December 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Overview of statistically hedged prediction methods: From off-line to real-time data analysis

  • 1. Asociación EURATOM/CIEMAT para Fusión, Avda, Complutense, 22, 28040 Madrid (Spain)
  • 2. Associazione EURATOM-ENEA per la Fusione, Consorzio RFX, 4-35127 Padova (Italy)

Description

Highlights: ► Off-line and real-time multi-class image classification applications (conformal prediction based) have been developed. ► We compare two different implementations (nearest neighbour and SVM) in the off-line applications. ► A real-time predictor (SVM based) takes a constant time of 89.7 ± 14.1 ms to classify each image. ► The one-versus-the-rest approach is used in the SVM multi-class classifiers. - Abstract: This work summarizes the latest results on prediction with newly developed estimators based on statistical significance. These predictors implement conformal predictions and have been applied to classification tasks for data of the TJ-II stellarator. In particular, different adaptations to solve a 5-class image classification problem for the TJ-II Thomson scattering (TS) are presented. Off-line (nearest neighbour and support vector machines based) and real-time (SVM based) versions of conformal predictors have been developed. In all cases, if the classifications are reliable, the predicted images are incorporated to the training dataset for future predictions. The nearest neighbour classifier (NNC) obtains a success rate of 97% with confidence 0.96 and a mean credibility of 0.61. The CPU time to predict shows a linear dependence with the number of images in the training set (t = 0.519n + 100.212 s). The SVM classifiers are used in the one versus the rest approach. The off-line version provides a success rate of 99%, a confidence of 0.99 and an average credibility of 0.55. The CPU time also follows a linear law with the number of images in the training set (t = 15.023 × 10−3n + 4.523 s). The real-time classifier achieves a success rate of 96% and a mean confidence and credibility of 0.99 and 0.53, respectively. In this case, after 395 classifications, the CPU time per image to classify remains constant: 89.7 ± 14.1 ms.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.01.037

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.01.037;
PII
S0920-3796(12)00048-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Fusion Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
87
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 2072-2075
ISSN
0920-3796
CODEN
FEDEEE

Conference

Title
8. IAEA technical meeting on control, data acquisition, and remote participation for fusion research
Dates
20-24 Jun 2011
Place
Livermore, CA (United States)

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44036968
Subject category
S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
DATA ANALYSIS; DATASETS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGES; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; THOMSON SCATTERING; TJ-II HELIAC; VECTOR PROCESSING
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; DOCUMENT TYPES; HELIAC STELLARATORS; INELASTIC SCATTERING; PROCESSING; PROGRAMMING; SCATTERING; STELLARATORS; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.