Published July 14, 2005 | Version v1
Report

Safety Software Guide Perspectives for the Design of New Nuclear Facilities (U)

Description

In June of this year, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued directives DOE O 414.1C and DOE G 414.1-4 to improve quality assurance programs, processes, and procedures among its safety contractors. Specifically, guidance entitled, ''Safety Software Guide for use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, DOE G 414.1-4'', provides information and acceptable methods to comply with safety software quality assurance (SQA) requirements. The guidance provides a roadmap for meeting DOE O 414.1C, ''Quality Assurance'', and the quality assurance program (QAP) requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance, for DOE nuclear facilities and software application activities. [1, 2] The order and guide are part of a comprehensive implementation plan that addresses issues and concerns documented in Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendation 2002-1. [3] Safety SQA requirements for DOE as well as National Nuclear Security Administration contractors are necessary to implement effective quality assurance (QA) processes and achieve safe nuclear facility operations. DOE G 414.1-4 was developed to provide guidance on establishing and implementing effective QA processes tied specifically to nuclear facility safety software applications. The Guide includes software application practices covered by appropriate national and international consensus standards and various processes currently in use at DOE facilities. While the safety software guidance is considered to be of sufficient rigor and depth to ensure acceptable reliability of safety software at all DOE nuclear facilities, new nuclear facilities are well suited to take advantage of the guide to ensure compliant programs and processes are implemented. Attributes such as the facility life-cycle stage and the hazardous nature of each facility operations are considered, along with the category and level of importance of the software. The discussion provided herein illustrates benefits of applying the Safety Software Guide to work activities dependent on software applications and directed toward the design of new nuclear facilities. In particular, the Guide-based systematic approach with software enables design processes to effectively proceed and reduce the likelihood of rework activities. Several application examples are provided for the new facility

Availability note (English)

Available from http://sti.srs.gov/fulltext/2005/WSRC-MS-2005-00423.pdf; PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/890080-h3lI9x/

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
5 p.
Report number
WSRC-MS--2005-00423

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
38003268
Subject category
S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
CONTRACTORS; DESIGN; IMPLEMENTATION; LIFE CYCLE; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RECOMMENDATIONS; REGULATIONS; RELIABILITY; SAFETY; SECURITY
Descriptors DEC
LAWS

Optional Information

Contract/Grant/Project number
AC09-96SR18500
Funding organization
US Department of Energy (United States)