Published October 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Simulation of price controls for different grade of gasoline: The case of Indonesia

  • 1. Colorado School of Mines, 1913 Digger Drive, Golden, CO 80401 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå (Sweden)
  • 3. Mineral and Energy Economics Program and Payne Institute of Earth Resources, Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • Alternative subsidy policy that controls price of gasoline by grades is proposed. • Under the benchmark scenario, a subsidy on premium gasoline reduces the overall cost of gasoline subsidy policy. • The proposed policy also reduces the inefficiency in overall gasoline market. • The saving generated by the government depends largely on the cross-price elasticity between regular and premium gasoline. - Abstract: A gasoline subsidy is one of the most prevalent strategies for distributing welfare to the people in oil-producing countries. However well-intentioned, the policy will distort the gasoline market with the resulting inefficiencies. Furthermore, the gasoline subsidy takes a great amount of government's budget. Arguably, these funds could be spent elsewhere with a greater impact on economic growth. These governments are aware of the cost of such a policy, yet face difficulties in removing the policy because of strong resistance from the public. This paper looks at the unique case of Indonesia that only provides a subsidy for regular gasoline and in turn proposes an alternative policy that introduces a subsidy for premium gasoline at a lower rate to reduce the overall gasoline subsidy cost. There has yet to be any research that simulates price controls for gasoline with different grades. The aggregate demand for gasoline in Indonesia is replicated using a translog cost calibration approach. Simulations based on the calibrated demand are then performed and the results confirm the existence of potential savings that are largely determined by the cross-price elasticities between regular and premium gasoline. The benchmark scenario, based on a recent study of substitutability between gasoline by grades, results in an 11.5% reduction in subsidy cost of around 950 million USD with a subsidy rate of Rp 2254/liter. Furthermore, the optimal rate of subsidy for premium gasoline results in a reduction of inefficiency as consumers' welfare increase by 6.8 trillion rupiahs (or 560 million USD).

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.012;
PII
S0140988317303535;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
68
Journal Page Range
p. 373-382
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50034921
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
BENCHMARKS; BUDGETS; CALIBRATION; CONTROL; COST; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC ELASTICITY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; GASOLINE; INDONESIA; MARKET; PRICES; SIMULATION
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FUELS; ISLANDS; LIQUID FUELS; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.