Assessment of stenosis severity: Correlation of angiography, T1-201 scintigraphy, and intracoronary pressure gradients

To clarify the relationship between angiographic and hemodynamic stenosis severity and the appearance during stress-redistribution myocardial T1-201 scintigraphy (Ex-T1) of a visual (V) or quantitative (Q) perfusion defect (PD) or washout (WO) abnormality, 24 pts with CAD underwent intracoronary pressure gradient study at bypass surgery (CABG). All had pre-CABG Ex-T1 without interval deterioration. The mean diastolic pressure gradient (MDG) measured at reproducible hyperemic flow rates was determined for 34 stenoses (13 LAD, 7 LCX, 14 RCA) and compared with the results of Ex-T1 in subtended myocardial regions (LAD=anterior; LCX=posterolateral; RCA=inferior). Fourteen stenoses (50-99% diameter narrowing) were unassociated with VPD despite maximal exercise: MDG was 9 +- 5mmHg, with MDG/mean aortic diastolic pressure (ADP) ratio of 0.12 +- 0.07. QPD and QWO analysis detected 8 of these. Thirteen stenoses (90-100% severity) led to reversible VPD: MDG was 36 +- 11 mm Hg, MDG/ADP ratio was 0.52 +- 0.17, and Q analysis was abnormal in 12/13. Seven stenoses (90-100% severity) subtended infarcted myocardium: MDG was 42 +- 21 mm Hg, MDG/ADP ratio was 0.52 +- 0.18, and V and Q analyses were abnormal in all. From this study, the authors derive the following conclusion: 1) Ex-T1 correlates better with hemodynamic severity of stenoses than does angiography; 2) V abnormalities identify stenoses of major angiographic and hemodynamic severity, while Q analysis detects some (57% in this study) stenoses of lesser severity; and 3) stenoses causing reversible Ex-T1 abnormalities present similar hemodynamic impediments to those causing myocardial infarcts