Published May 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Permanent Breast Seed Implant Dosimetry Quality Assurance

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  • 2. Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  • 3. Carlo Fidani Regional Cancer Center, Mississauga, ON (Canada)

Description

Purpose: A permanent breast seed implant is a novel method of accelerated partial breast irradiation for women with early-stage breast cancer. This article presents pre- and post-implant dosimetric data, relates these data to clinical outcomes, and makes recommendations for those interested in starting a program. Methods and Materials: A total of 95 consecutive patients were accrued into one of three clinical trials after breast-conserving surgery: a Phase I/II trial (67 patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma); a Phase II registry trial (25 patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma); or a multi-center Phase II trial for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (3 patients). Contouring of the planning target volume (PTV) was done on a Pinnacle workstation and dosimetry calculations, including dose–volume histograms, were done using a Variseed planning computer. Results: The mean pre-implant PTV coverage for the V90, V100, V150, and V200 were as follows: 98.8% ± 1.2% (range, 94.5–100%); 97.3% ± 2.1% (range, 90.3–99.9%), 68.8% ± 14.3% (range, 32.7–91.5%); and 27.8% ± 8.6% (range, 15.1–62.3%). The effect of seed motion was characterized by post-implant dosimetry performed immediately after the implantation (same day) and at 2 months after the implantation. The mean V100 changed from 85.6% to 88.4% (p = 0.004) and the mean V200 changed from 36.2% to 48.3% (p < 0.001). Skin toxicity was associated with maximum skin dose (p = 0.014). Conclusions: Preplanning dosimetry should aim for a V90 of approximately 100%, a V100 between 95% and 100%, and a V200 between 20% and 30%, as these numbers are associated with no local recurrences to date and good patient tolerance. In general, the target volume coverage improved over the duration of the seed therapy. The maximum skin dose, defined as the average dose over the hottest 1 × 1-cm2 surface area, should be limited to 90% of the prescription dose to minimize delayed skin toxicity.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.030

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.030;
PII
S0360-3016(11)02771-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 84-92
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44016686
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARCINOMAS; CLINICAL TRIALS; DOSIMETRY; IRRADIATION; MAMMARY GLANDS; PATIENTS; PLANNING; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIATION DOSES; RADIATION SOURCE IMPLANTS; SKIN; SURGERY; THERAPY; TOXICITY; WOMEN
Descriptors DEC
ANIMALS; BODY; DISEASES; DOSES; FEMALES; GLANDS; IMPLANTS; MAMMALS; MAN; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS; PRIMATES; RADIATION SOURCES; TESTING; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.