Published July 20, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

On the two approaches to the data analysis of the Cassini interplanetary relativity experiment

  • 1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 (United States)

Description

We compare two theoretical approaches to the data analysis of the Cassini relativity experiment based on the Doppler tracking and the time delay technique that were published correspondingly by Kopeikin et al. [S.M. Kopeikin, A.G. Polnarev, G. Schaefer, I.Yu. Vlasov, Phys. Lett. A 367 (2007) 276] and by Bertotti et al. [B. Bertotti, N. Ashby, L. Iess, Class. Quantum Grav. 25 (2008) 045013]. Bertotti et al. believed that they found a discrepancy with our paper and claimed that our analysis was erroneous. The present Letter elucidates, however, that the discrepancy is illusory and does not exist. The two techniques give the same result making it evident that the numerical value of the PPN parameter γ measured in the Cassini experiment is indeed affected by the orbital motion of the Sun around the barycenter of the solar system.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.05.058

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2009.05.058;
arXiv
arXiv:0901.4818v2;
PII
S0375-9601(09)00671-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physics Letters. A
Journal Volume
373
Journal Issue
31
Journal Page Range
p. 2605-2607
ISSN
0375-9601
CODEN
PYLAAG

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
41077510
Subject category
S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Numerical Data
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DATA ANALYSIS; DOPPLER EFFECT; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; GRAVITATION; RELATIVISTIC RANGE; SOLAR SYSTEM; SUN; THEORETICAL DATA; TIME DELAY
Descriptors DEC
DATA; ENERGY RANGE; EVALUATION; INFORMATION; MAIN SEQUENCE STARS; NUMERICAL DATA; STARS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.