A comparative study of reverse osmosis and activated charcoal, two inexpensive and very effective ways to remove waterborne radon
Creators
- 1. Marymount Univ., Arlington, VA (United States)
- 2. George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA (United States)
Description
A two year comparative study of waterborne radon removal reveals that reverse osmosis is consistently more effective than the use of activated charcoal. Reverse osmosis is a process by which water is forced under a pressure sufficient to overcome osmotic pressure through a semipermeable membrane, leaving behind impurities. Removal effectiveness for dissolved organic, dissolved ionic and suspended impurities are typically above 90%. Systems designed for home use to remove impurities from water dispensed at a convenient tap cost about $2000 and commonly consist of a sediment filter, a carbon prefilter, and a reverse osmosis container. A tank of activated charcoal can work equally well, and cost $500-$1000. However, the tank of charcoal becomes measurably enriched in gamma-emitters
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society.
- Imprint Place
- Washington, DC (United States)
- Imprint Title
- 208th ACS national meeting
- Imprint Pagination
- 2072 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 580, Paper ENVR 210.
Conference
- Title
- 208. American Chemical Society national meeting.
- Dates
- 21-26 Aug 1994.
- Place
- Washington, DC (United States).
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 26020482
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- ACTIVATED CARBON; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DECONTAMINATION; OSMOSIS; RADON; REMOVAL; WATER
- Descriptors DEC
- ADSORBENTS; CARBON; CLEANING; ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; NONMETALS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; RARE GASES
Optional Information
- Secondary number(s)
- CONF-940813--.