Published 1994 | Version v1
Book

A comparative study of reverse osmosis and activated charcoal, two inexpensive and very effective ways to remove waterborne radon

  • 1. Marymount Univ., Arlington, VA (United States)
  • 2. George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA (United States)

Description

A two year comparative study of waterborne radon removal reveals that reverse osmosis is consistently more effective than the use of activated charcoal. Reverse osmosis is a process by which water is forced under a pressure sufficient to overcome osmotic pressure through a semipermeable membrane, leaving behind impurities. Removal effectiveness for dissolved organic, dissolved ionic and suspended impurities are typically above 90%. Systems designed for home use to remove impurities from water dispensed at a convenient tap cost about $2000 and commonly consist of a sediment filter, a carbon prefilter, and a reverse osmosis container. A tank of activated charcoal can work equally well, and cost $500-$1000. However, the tank of charcoal becomes measurably enriched in gamma-emitters

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
American Chemical Society.
Imprint Place
Washington, DC (United States)
Imprint Title
208th ACS national meeting
Imprint Pagination
2072 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 580, Paper ENVR 210.

Conference

Title
208. American Chemical Society national meeting.
Dates
21-26 Aug 1994.
Place
Washington, DC (United States).

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
26020482
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ACTIVATED CARBON; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DECONTAMINATION; OSMOSIS; RADON; REMOVAL; WATER
Descriptors DEC
ADSORBENTS; CARBON; CLEANING; ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; NONMETALS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; RARE GASES

Optional Information

Secondary number(s)
CONF-940813--.