Published August 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Current ramps in tokamaks: from present experiments to ITER scenarios

  • 1. CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint Paul Lez Durance (France)
  • 2. FOM Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen, Association EURATOM-FOM, Nieuwegein (Netherlands)
  • 3. Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Assoziation, Garching (Germany)
  • 4. Association EURATOM-OeAW/ATI, Vienna (Austria)
  • 5. RRC 'Kurchatov Institute', Moscow (Russian Federation)
  • 6. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 801-1, Mukouyama, Naka, Ibaraki-ken 311-0193 (Japan)
  • 7. Nippon Advanced Technology Co., Ltd. Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1112 Japan (Japan)
  • 8. EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon OX14 3DB UK (United Kingdom)
  • 9. ITER Organization, Route de Vinon sur Verdon, F-13115 St Paul lez Durance (France)
  • 10. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PO Box 451, Princeton, NJ USA (United States)
  • 11. Association Euratom-IST, Lisboa (Portugal)
  • 12. Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501 (Japan)

Description

In order to prepare adequate current ramp-up and ramp-down scenarios for ITER, present experiments from various tokamaks have been analysed by means of integrated modelling in view of determining relevant heat transport models for these operation phases. A set of empirical heat transport models for L-mode (namely, the Bohm-gyroBohm model and scaling based models with a specific fixed radial shape and energy confinement time factors of H96-L = 0.6 or HIPB98 = 0.4) has been validated on a multi-machine experimental dataset for predicting the li dynamics within ±0.15 accuracy during current ramp-up and ramp-down phases. Simulations using the Coppi-Tang or GLF23 models (applied up to the LCFS) overestimate or underestimate the internal inductance beyond this accuracy (more than ±0.2 discrepancy in some cases). The most accurate heat transport models are then applied to projections to ITER current ramp-up, focusing on the baseline inductive scenario (main heating plateau current of Ip = 15 MA). These projections include a sensitivity study to various assumptions of the simulation. While the heat transport model is at the heart of such simulations (because of the intrinsic dependence of the plasma resistivity on electron temperature, among other parameters), more comprehensive simulations are required to test all operational aspects of the current ramp-up and ramp-down phases of ITER scenarios. Recent examples of such simulations, involving coupled core transport codes, free-boundary equilibrium solvers and a poloidal field (PF) systems controller are also described, focusing on ITER current ramp-down.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/51/8/083026

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/0029-5515/51/8/083026;
PII
S0029-5515(11)80357-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Fusion
Journal Volume
51
Journal Issue
8
Journal Page Range
[11 p.]
ISSN
0029-5515
CODEN
NUFUAU

INIS

Country of Publication
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43006304
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Descriptors DEI
CONFINEMENT TIME; HEAT TRANSFER; ITER TOKAMAK; L-MODE PLASMA CONFINEMENT; SIMULATION
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; CONFINEMENT; ENERGY TRANSFER; MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT; PLASMA CONFINEMENT; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TOKAMAK TYPE REACTORS