Published March 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

Baseload wind energy: modeling the competition between gas turbines and compressed air energy storage for supplemental generation

  • 1. Environmental Defense, Oakland, CA (United States)
  • 2. Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ (United States)
  • 3. Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States)
  • 4. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ (United States)

Description

The economic viability of producing baseload wind energy was explored using a cost-optimization model to simulate two competing systems: wind energy supplemented by simple- and combined cycle natural gas turbines ('wind+gas'), and wind energy supplemented by compressed air energy storage ('wind+CAES'). Pure combined cycle natural gas turbines ('gas') were used as a proxy for conventional baseload generation. Long-distance electric transmission was integral to the analysis. Given the future uncertainty in both natural gas price and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions price, we introduced an effective fuel price, p NGeff, being the sum of the real natural gas price and the GHG price. Under the assumption of p NGeff=$5/GJ (lower heating value), 650 W/m2 wind resource, 750 km transmission line, and a fixed 90% capacity factor, wind+CAES was the most expensive system at cents 6.0/kWh, and did not break even with the next most expensive wind+gas system until p NGeff=$9.0/GJ. However, under real market conditions, the system with the least dispatch cost (short-run marginal cost) is dispatched first, attaining the highest capacity factor and diminishing the capacity factors of competitors, raising their total cost. We estimate that the wind+CAES system, with a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rate that is one-fourth of that for natural gas combined cycle plants and about one-tenth of that for pulverized coal plants, has the lowest dispatch cost of the alternatives considered (lower even than for coal power plants) above a GHG emissions price of $35/tCequiv., with good prospects for realizing a higher capacity factor and a lower total cost of energy than all the competing technologies over a wide range of effective fuel costs. This ability to compete in economic dispatch greatly boosts the market penetration potential of wind energy and suggests a substantial growth opportunity for natural gas in providing baseload power via wind+CAES, even at high natural gas prices

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.023;
PII
S0301-4215(06)00150-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
35
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 1474-1492
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.