Published April 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Analysis on hydrogen risk mitigation in severe accidents for Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor

  • 1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800, Dong Chuan Rd., Shanghai, 200240 (China)

Description

Highlights: •Hydrogen risk for HPWR is assessed using the mechanical analytical code. •Two typical severe accident sequences induced by SBO and LLOCA are selected. •Thermal hydraulic and hydrogen source term are studied. •Hydrogen mitigation with igniters is investigated. -- Abstract: Hydrogen source term and hydrogen mitigation under severe accidents is evaluated for most nuclear power plants (NPPs) after Fukushima Daiichi accident. Two units of Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor (PHWR) are under operating in China, and hydrogen risk control should be evaluated in detail for the existing design. The distinguish feature of PHWR, compared with PWR, is the horizontal reactor core surrounded by moderator in calandria vessel (CV), which may influence the hydrogen source term. Based on integral system analysis code of PHWR, the plant model including primary heat transfer system (PHTS), calandria, end shield system, reactor cavity and containment has been developed. Two severe accident sequences have been selected to study hydrogen generation characteristic and the effectiveness of hydrogen mitigation with igniters. The one is Station Blackout (SBO) which represents high-pressure core melt accident, and the other is Large Break Loss of Coolant Accident (LLOCA) at reactor outlet header (ROH) which represents low-pressure core melt accident. Results show that under severe accident sequences, core oxidation of zirconium–steam reaction will produce hydrogen with deterioration of core cooling and the water in CV and reactor cavity can inhibits hydrogen generation for a relatively long time. However, as the water dries out, creep failure happens on CV. As a result, molten core falls into cavity and molten core concrete interaction (MCCI) occurs, releasing a large mass of hydrogen. When hydrogen igniters fail, volume fraction of hydrogen in the containment is more than 15% while equivalent amount of hydrogen generate from a 100% fuel clad-coolant reaction. As a result, hydrogen risk lies in the deflagration–detonation transition area. When igniters start at the beginning of large hydrogen generation, hydrogen mixtures ignite at low concentration in the compartments and the combustion mode locates at the edge of flammable area. However, the power supply to igniters should be ensured.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.12.011

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.12.011;
PII
S0149197014003539;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Journal Volume
80
Journal Page Range
p. 128-135
ISSN
0149-1970

Optional Information

Notes
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.