Published April 2006 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of 16-slice MSCT and MRI in the assessment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

  • 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 Munich (Germany)
  • 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Technology Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 Munich (Germany)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue A367, San Francisco, CA 94143 (United States)

Description

The goal of this retrospective study was to assess the accuracy of 16-slice multislice CT (MSCT) and MRI in staging of patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity. Fifty-two patients with histologically proven primary SCC were examined with contrast enhanced MSCT and MRI at 1.5 T with a combined head and surface neck coil. Image modalities were evaluated in a blinded fashion by two radiologists and an oral-maxillofacial surgeon in consensus concerning tumour depiction, local tumour infiltration and cervical lymph node metastases. Results of the radiological assessment were correlated with the intraoperative and histopathological findings in all patients. 36 of 52 primary tumours (69.2%) were depicted by MSCT while 44 were localized by MRI (84.6%). Regarding muscle infiltration MRI versus MSCT had a sensitivity of 81.8% versus 72.7%, but a low specificity and an accuracy of 63.4% versus 61% and 67.3% versus 63.5%, respectively, were found. There was a trend towards a better detection of bony infiltration by MRI than MSCT with a sensitivity of 100% versus 71.4%, a specificity of 93.3% versus 95.5% and an accuracy 94.2% versus 92.3%, respectively. Detection of cervical lymph node involvement was similar for MRI and MSCT with a sensitivity of 84.2% and 78.9%, a specificity of 63.6% and 75.7% and an accuracy of 71.1% and 76.9%, respectively. For N-staging both methods failed to detect small metastasis. For T-staging MRI was superior to MSCT, because there was a tendency to underestimate the tumour size by MSCT more often (19.4% versus 6.8% by MRI). Therefore, pre-operative MRI is recommended as the basic imaging modality of choice for treatment planning of oral SCC. MSCT is a valid alternative imaging method especially in cases with low patient compliance

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.11.006;
PII
S0720-048X(05)00362-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
58
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 113-118
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
37080298
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; CARCINOMAS; HEAD; IMAGES; LYMPH NODES; METASTASES; MUSCLES; NECK; NMR IMAGING; ORAL CAVITY; PATIENTS; SENSITIVITY; SKELETON; SPECIFICITY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; LYMPHATIC SYSTEM; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.