The effect of time and dose fractionation on the response of Harwell Gammachrome YR PMMA dosimeter
- 1. ISTLS, University of Sousse, Campus Erriadh, Sousse 4029 (Tunisia)
- 2. Research Unit: Control and Development of Nuclear Techniques for Peaceful Uses, National Center for Nuclear Sciences and Technology, 2020, Sidi Thabet (Tunisia)
- 3. Military Academy, Fondouk Jedid, 8012 Nabeul (Tunisia)
- 4. National Research Center for Materials Sciences. Hammam-Lif 2050 (Tunisia)
Description
In some irradiation facilities, dosimeters may receive their total absorbed dose in two or more absorbed-dose increments. Some interruptions may be planned, for example multiple irradiations may be used to avoid increasing irradiation temperature in electron beam accelerators. Other interruptions may be the result of unplanned irradiator shutdowns. Dose fractionation effects from both planned and unplanned interruptions should be quantified by determining the effect for different dose fractions and interruption times between successive irradiations. This work describes experiments carried out on the response of Gammachrome YR PMMA dosimeters to both single fractions and fractionated doses (two absorbed-dose increments separated by different intervals of time: 0.5, 1, 2, and 24 h). Specific absorbance measurements were carried out as a function of post-irradiation time, following the completion of irradiation in the total doses, from 20 to 250 min. Our work demonstrates that specific absorbance as a function of post-irradiation time depends significantly on total dose and the fractionation time. For measurements taken 2 h after irradiation, it was found that relative response variations due to dose fractionation were between −3% and +2% for dosimeters irradiated to 0.2 kGy and from −1.34% to −4% for those irradiated to 2 kGy. - Highlights: • No information is available in the literature on the dependence of GC dosimeter on dose fractionation. • We studied the response kinetics of GC dosimeters to single and fractionated doses. • We used 2 absorbed-dose increments separated by intervals of time: 0.5, 1, 2, 15 and 24 h. • We found that response variations depend on total dose and fractionation time. • Further investigation is needed to develop correction factors that minimize their impact
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.01.023Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.01.023;
- PII
- S0969-806X(14)00037-1;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiation Physics and Chemistry (1993)
- Journal Volume
- 98
- Journal Page Range
- p. 113-117
- ISSN
- 0969-806X
- CODEN
- RPCHDM
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46047544
- Subject category
- S38: RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ABSORBED RADIATION DOSES; DOSEMETERS; ELECTRON BEAMS; FRACTIONATED IRRADIATION; IRRADIATION PLANTS; KINETICS; PMMA
- Descriptors DEC
- BEAMS; DOSES; ESTERS; IRRADIATION; LEPTON BEAMS; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; PARTICLE BEAMS; POLYACRYLATES; POLYMERS; POLYVINYLS; RADIATION DOSES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.