Published April 1, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Identifying extra high frequency gravitational waves generated from oscillons with cuspy potentials using deep neural networks

  • 1. Department of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331 (China)
  • 2. Department of Electronical Information Science and Technology, Xingtai University, Xingtai 054001 (China)

Description

During oscillations of cosmology inflation around the minimum of a cuspy potential after inflation, the existence of extra high frequency gravitational waves (HFGWs) (∼GHz) has been proven effectively recently. Based on the electromagnetic resonance system for detecting such extra HFGWs, we adopt a new data processing scheme to identify the corresponding GW signal, which is the transverse perturbative photon fluxes (PPF). In order to overcome the problems of low efficiency and high interference in traditional data processing methods, we adopt deep learning to extract PPF and make some source parameters estimation. Deep learning is able to provide an effective method to realize classification and prediction tasks. Meanwhile, we also adopt anti-overfitting technique and make adjustment of some hyperparameters in the course of study, which improve the performance of classifier and predictor to a certain extent. Here the convolutional neural network (CNN) is used to implement deep learning process concretely. In this case, we investigate the classification accuracy varying with the ratio between the number of positive and negative samples. When such ratio exceeds to 0.11, the accuracy could reach up to 100%. Besides, we also investigate the classification accuracy with different amplitude of extra HFGWs. As a predictor, the mean relative error of parameters estimation decreases when the amplitude of extra HFGWs increases. Especially, when amplitude h(t) is in 10−31–10−30 the mean relative error reaches around 0.014. On the contrary, the mean relative error increases with frequency increasing in 108–1011 Hz. At the optimal resonance frequency 5 × 109 Hz, the mean relative error is 0.12. Then we also study the mean relative error varying with waist radius W 0 of Gaussian beam, its optimal value is 0.138 when W 0 is in (0.05 m, 0.1 m) approximately. Compared with classifiers and predictors using other machine learning algorithms, deep CNN for our datasets has higher accuracy and lower error. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab1310

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
New Journal of Physics
Journal Volume
21
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
[12 p.]
ISSN
1367-2630

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
52037128
Subject category
S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; COSMOLOGICAL INFLATION; DATA PROCESSING; EFFICIENCY; E-LEARNING; ERRORS; GHZ RANGE; GRAVITATIONAL WAVES; INTERFERENCE; NEURAL NETWORKS; OSCILLATIONS; PHOTONS; RESONANCE; SIGNALS
Descriptors DEC
BOSONS; EDUCATION; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; FREQUENCY RANGE; LEARNING; MASSLESS PARTICLES; PROCESSING; TRAINING