Published August 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Antero-posterior (AP) pelvis x-ray imaging on a trolley: Impact of trolley design, mattress design and radiographer practice on image quality and radiation dose

  • 1. University of Salford, Allerton Building, Frederick Road, Manchester M5 4WT (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB), North Wales, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd Road, Bangor LL57 2PW, Wales (United Kingdom)

Description

Introduction: Physical and technical differences exist between imaging on an x-ray tabletop and imaging on a trolley. This study evaluates how trolley imaging impacts image quality and radiation dose for an antero-posterior (AP) pelvis projection whilst subsequently exploring means of optimising this imaging examination. Methods: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was imaged on a commercially available trolley under various conditions. Variables explored included two mattresses, two image receptor holder positions, three source to image distances (SIDs) and four mAs values. Image quality was evaluated using relative visual grading analysis with the reference image acquired on the x-ray tabletop. Contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Effective dose was established using Monte Carlo simulation. Optimisation scores were derived as a figure of merit by dividing effective dose with visual image quality scores. Results: Visual image quality reduced significantly (p < 0.05) whilst effective dose increased significantly (p < 0.05) for images acquired on the trolley using identical acquisition parameters to the reference image. The trolley image with the highest optimisation score was acquired using 130 cm SID, 20 mAs, the standard mattress and platform not elevated. A difference of 12.8 mm was found between the image with the lowest and highest magnification factor (18%). Conclusion: The acquisition parameters used for AP pelvis on the x-ray tabletop are not transferable to trolley imaging and should be modified accordingly to compensate for the differences that exist. Exposure charts should be developed for trolley imaging to ensure optimal image quality at lowest possible dose. - Highlights: • Acquisition parameters used for AP pelvis imaging on a trolley need adapting from those used on the x-ray tabletop. • Radiation dose significantly increases for trolley imaging. • An increase in SID can reduce radiation dose and magnification for trolley imaging without compromising image quality. • Exposure charts need to be developed for trolley imaging.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.04.002

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radi.2017.04.002;
PII
S1078-8174(17)30053-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiography (London 1995)
Journal Volume
23
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 242-248
ISSN
1078-8174

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49049792
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DESIGN; EFFECTIVE RADIATION DOSES; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; PELVIS; RADIOLOGICAL PERSONNEL; X RADIATION
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; DOSES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; IONIZING RADIATIONS; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PERSONNEL; RADIATION DOSES; RADIATIONS; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.