Misorientation dependent epilayer tilting and stress distribution in heteroepitaxially grown silicon carbide on silicon (111) substrate
Creators
- 1. Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111 (Australia)
- 2. Bluglass Ltd., 74 Asquith Street, Silverwater, NSW 2128 (Australia)
Description
The advantages and disadvantages of using off-axis substrates for heteroepitaxial growth of 3C-SiC on Si(111) substrates are investigated in this paper. 3C-SiC is deposited on on-axis and 4° off-axis 150 mm Si(111) substrates using low pressure chemical vapour deposition. The dependence of surface morphology, roughness, crystallinity, alignment between the epilayer and the substrate, and film stress are evaluated using atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and wafer curvature measurement. Highly parallel steps are observed on both on-axis and off-axis Si substrates after surface preparation, yet step density is doubled and step height is much larger (> 21 times of single step height) for 4° off-cut Si compared to on-axis Si. X-ray diffraction results indicate that SiC grown on on-axis Si substrates are well-aligned with the Si substrates, while the SiC grown on off-axis substrates are tilted positively by as large angle as 1.66°. The well-aligned SiC grown on on-axis Si substrate exhibits lower and uniform residual stress compared to the film grown on off-axis Si substrates, which exhibits a nonuniform distribution of higher stress. The stress distribution is found to be dependent on Si surface step direction and height. These misorientation dependent tilting and stress distribution mechanisms are expected to be applicable to other hetero-epitaxial growth systems with similar mismatch magnitude. - Highlights: • SiC grown on on-axis Si substrates are well-aligned with the Si substrates. • The well-aligned SiC grown on on-axis Si exhibits lower and uniform stress. • SiC grown on off-axis substrate has a positive tilting of 1.66°. • SiC grown on off-axis Si exhibits a nonuniform distribution of higher stress. • The stress and tilting are dependent on Si surface step direction and height
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.05.052Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.05.052;
- PII
- S0040-6090(14)00627-0;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Thin Solid Films
- Journal Volume
- 564
- Journal Page Range
- p. 39-44
- ISSN
- 0040-6090
- CODEN
- THSFAP
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47004097
- Subject category
- S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CRYSTAL GROWTH; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EPITAXY; MORPHOLOGY; RESIDUAL STRESSES; ROUGHNESS; SILICON; SILICON CARBIDES; SUBSTRATES; SURFACES; THIN FILMS; X-RAY DIFFRACTION
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBIDES; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CHEMICAL COATING; COHERENT SCATTERING; CRYSTAL GROWTH METHODS; DEPOSITION; DIFFRACTION; ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; FILMS; MICROSCOPY; SCATTERING; SEMIMETALS; SILICON COMPOUNDS; STRESSES; SURFACE COATING; SURFACE PROPERTIES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.