An examination of k-factor in TEM-EDS analysis for grain boundary segregation in neutron-irradiated stainless steels
- 1. Institute of Nuclear Safety System, Inc., Institute of Nuclear Technology, Mihama, Fukui (Japan)
- 2. Nippon Nuclear Fuel Development Co., Ltd., Oarai, Ibaraki (Japan)
Description
Grain boundary (GB) segregation in stainless steels due to neutron irradiations is considered to be one of the factors causing irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC); therefore, accurate quantitative evaluations are required to understand the IASCC behavior. GB segregation is typically evaluated by using transmission electron microscope (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS). To quantify the concentration of each element, the Cliff-Lorimer method is generally used, which assumes that the intensity ratio of the characteristic X-rays is proportional to the concentration ratio of the elements. There are some methods for determining the proportionality constant for each element, the "k-factor", however, there are only a few studies about the effect of the difference in k-factor determination methods on quantified values of GB segregations. In the present study, the extent of the effect was investigated by comparing the elemental concentrations quantified with k-factors determined by three methods with respect to TEM-EDS data obtained for a GB of a baffle former bolt that had irradiated to a dose of 18.8 dpa (displacements per atom). For Cr, Mn, and Mo, there was not much difference for the GB composition and the amount of GB segregation even if the k-factor determination methods were different, while for Ni and Si, the effect of the difference in k-factor determination methods was relatively large. The change in the amount of GB segregation due to the difference in the k-factor determination methods was smaller than the reported variation in the amount of GB segregation of Cr and Ni; therefore, the effect of the difference in the k-factor determination methods on the quantified values of GB segregation was confirmed to be small. It was also found that the method to correct each k-factor using the chemical composition of the material being analyzed is the most convenient and the most accurate for quantifying GB segregation among the three k-factor determination methods. (author)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://www.inss.co.jp/research/inss/journal29/Abstract (Japanese)
中性子照射によりステンレス鋼に生じる粒界偏析は照射誘起応力腐食割れ(IASCC)の原因の一つと考えられており,精度良い定量評価がIASCC挙動の理解のために求められる.粒界偏析の測定には透過型電子顕微鏡(TEM)とエネルギー分散型X線分光分析装置(EDS)が広く用いられ,各元素の濃度は特性X線の強度比と元素の濃度比が比例するとするCliff-Lorimer法により求められるのが一般的である.比例定数であるk因子の決定には複数の方法があるが,粒界偏析の測定値に及ぼす影響の程度については良く調べられていない.本研究では,照射量18.8dpaのバッフルフォーマボルトの粒界について測定されたTEM-EDSデータに対して,3種類の方法で決定したk因子を用いて算出した濃度を比較し,その影響の程度を調べた.CrとMn,Moについてはk因子の決定法を変えても粒界組成と粒界偏析量の測定値は大きく変わらないが,NiとSiについてはその影響が比較的大きいことが分かった.k因子の決定法の違いによる粒界偏析量の変化は報告されているCrやNi の粒界偏析量のばらつきと比べて小さく,k因子の決定法の違いが粒界偏析の評価結果に及ぼす影響は小さいことが確認された.また,化学組成を用いてk因子を補正する方法が,簡便かつ正確に粒界偏析を定量評価できるk因子の決定法であることが分かった.(著者)Additional details
Additional titles
- Original title (Japanese)
- 照射ステンレス鋼の粒界偏析のTEM-EDS分析における k 因子の検討
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- INSS Journal
- Journal Volume
- 29
- Journal Page Range
- p. 159-171
- ISSN
- 1340-4482
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Japan
- Country of Input or Organization
- Japan
- INIS RN
- 54069065
- Subject category
- S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CRACKS; ELECTROPOLISHING; ENERGY-LEVEL TRANSITIONS; GRAIN BOUNDARIES; IRRADIATION; PWR TYPE REACTORS; SEGREGATION; STAINLESS STEELS; STRESS CORROSION; THIN FILMS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY
- Descriptors DEC
- ALLOYS; CARBON ADDITIONS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; CORROSION; ELECTROLYSIS; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; FILMS; HIGH ALLOY STEELS; IRON ALLOYS; IRON BASE ALLOYS; LYSIS; MICROSCOPY; MICROSTRUCTURE; POLISHING; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; SPECTROSCOPY; STEELS; SURFACE FINISHING; THERMAL REACTORS; TRANSITION ELEMENT ALLOYS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS
Optional Information
- Notes
- 11 refs., 6 figs., 5 tabs.