Published April 7, 2007
| Version v1
Journal article
Two Prediction Methods For Ductile Sheet Metal Failure
Creators
- 1. INSA de Lyon, LaMCoS, 20 avenue Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne (France)
- 2. MECANIUM, 66 boulevard Niels Bohr, 69603 Villeurbanne (France)
Description
Two analytical approaches are detailed for the determination of Forming Limit Diagrams (F.L.D.) and compared with experimental results. The first one is the 'Enhanced Modified Maximum Force Criterion EMMFC' and the second one is the 'Through-Thickness Shear Instability Criterion TTSIC'. The criteria are both written in an intrinsic analytical form and are applicable to linear and non-linear given strain paths as it occurs in any FEM codes for sheet-metal forming simulation. Finally, the two methods are complementary depending on the nature of failure and the predicted curves are in reasonable agreement with the trend of experimental results for a wide range of materials
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1063/1.2729528;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- AIP Conference Proceedings
- Journal Volume
- 907
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 297-302
- ISSN
- 0094-243X
- CODEN
- APCPCS
Conference
- Title
- 10. ESAFORM conference on material forming
- Dates
- 18-20 Apr 2007
- Place
- Zaragoza (Spain)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 39074235
- Subject category
- S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- ALLOYS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; FAILURES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INSTABILITY; MATERIALS WORKING; METALS; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; SHEAR; SHEETS; STRAINS; THICKNESS
- Descriptors DEC
- CALCULATION METHODS; DIMENSIONS; ELEMENTS; FABRICATION; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; SIMULATION
Optional Information
- Notes
- (c) 2007 American Institute of Physics