Published April 7, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

Two Prediction Methods For Ductile Sheet Metal Failure

  • 1. INSA de Lyon, LaMCoS, 20 avenue Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne (France)
  • 2. MECANIUM, 66 boulevard Niels Bohr, 69603 Villeurbanne (France)

Description

Two analytical approaches are detailed for the determination of Forming Limit Diagrams (F.L.D.) and compared with experimental results. The first one is the 'Enhanced Modified Maximum Force Criterion EMMFC' and the second one is the 'Through-Thickness Shear Instability Criterion TTSIC'. The criteria are both written in an intrinsic analytical form and are applicable to linear and non-linear given strain paths as it occurs in any FEM codes for sheet-metal forming simulation. Finally, the two methods are complementary depending on the nature of failure and the predicted curves are in reasonable agreement with the trend of experimental results for a wide range of materials

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
AIP Conference Proceedings
Journal Volume
907
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 297-302
ISSN
0094-243X
CODEN
APCPCS

Conference

Title
10. ESAFORM conference on material forming
Dates
18-20 Apr 2007
Place
Zaragoza (Spain)

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
39074235
Subject category
S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ALLOYS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; FAILURES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INSTABILITY; MATERIALS WORKING; METALS; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; SHEAR; SHEETS; STRAINS; THICKNESS
Descriptors DEC
CALCULATION METHODS; DIMENSIONS; ELEMENTS; FABRICATION; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2007 American Institute of Physics