Published August 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Portrayal of radiology in a major medical television series: How does it influence the perception of radiology among patients and radiology professionals?

  • 1. Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Box 3808, Durham, NC (United States)
  • 2. University Hospital Basel, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Basel (Switzerland)
  • 3. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (United States)
  • 4. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Dallas, TX (United States)

Description

To assess how the portrayal of Radiology on medical TV shows is perceived by patients and radiology professionals. In this IRB-approved study with patient consent waived, surveys were conducted among adult patients scheduled for radiological examinations and radiology professionals. The questionnaire investigated medical TV watching habits including interest in medical TV shows, appearance of radiological examination/staff, radiology's role in diagnosis-making, and rating of the shows' accuracy in portraying radiology relative to reality. One hundred and twenty-six patients and 240 professionals (133 technologists, 107 radiologists) participated. 63.5 % patients and 63.2 % technologists rated interest in medical TV shows ≥5 (scale 1-10) versus 38.3 % of radiologists. All groups noted regular (every 2nd/3rd show) to >1/show appearance of radiological examinations in 58.5-88.2 % compared to 21.0-46.2 % for radiological staff appearance. Radiology played a role in diagnosis-making regularly to >1/show in 45.3-52.6 %. There is a positive correlation for interest in medical TV and the perception that radiology is accurately portrayed for patients (r = 0.49; P = 0.001) and technologists (r = 0.38; P = 0.001) but not for radiologists (r = 0.01). The majority of patients perceive the portrayed content as accurate. Radiologists should be aware of this cultivation effect to understand their patients' behaviour which may create false expectations towards radiological examinations and potential safety hazards. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4079-3

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
26
Journal Issue
8
Journal Page Range
p. 2863-2869
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3