Published January 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Improving sustainability of aquaculture in Europe: Stakeholder dialogues on Integrated Multi-trophic Aquaculture (IMTA)

  • 1. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll PA34 4YE (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies, University of Haifa, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 31905 (Israel)
  • 3. Migal Galilee Research Centre, P.O.B. 831, Kiryat Shmona (Israel)
  • 4. GIFAS, Nordvågen, N-8140 Inndyr (Norway)
  • 5. Marine and Environmental Research Lab Ltd, 20 Christou Tsiarta St., Nicosia 1041 (Cyprus)
  • 6. Bioforsk Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, Frederik A. Dahlsvei 20, 1430 ÅS (Norway)
  • 7. Department on Earth, Environment and Life Sciences, University of Genoa, Corso Europa, Genova 26-16135 (Italy)
  • 8. Daithi O'Murchu Marine Research Station, Gearhies, Bantry, Co. Cork (Ireland)

Description

Highlights: • Levels of awareness of IMTA were variable across stakeholder groups and across countries. • Positive aspects of IMTA included environmental benefits such as waste utilisation and economic benefits. • Negative impacts of IMTA identified as spatial and location issues, disease outbreak potential, food safety and containment. • IMTA may contribute to improving the image of the aquaculture industry. - Abstract: Research into stakeholder perceptions of conventional aquaculture has focused upon issues such as risk, impact on other users of marine space, and the factors influencing consumers. However, some of these issues may become redundant with new aquaculture practices such as Integrated Multi-trophic Aquaculture (IMTA). For practices such as IMTA to realise their potential they must be socially acceptable and this may depend on satisfying key stakeholders. This study used in-depth interviews to identify potential concerns of stakeholders as well as perceived benefits in relation to the development of IMTA to a commercial level of production. A total of 44 interviews were conducted across 12 stakeholder groups in six countries: Cyprus, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Norway and Scotland. Levels of awareness and understanding of IMTA were mixed across stakeholder groups and across countries. Concerns were raised including: spatial location issues, food safety and disease. Perceived benefits of IMTA included: waste utilisation, minimisation of impacts to the benthos and the filtering of sea lice larvae. Also recognised as important was the creation of new income streams. The results showed that some issues/benefits were more important in certain countries. Risks to the environment, risks arising from governance and risks to the industry itself were raised, but stakeholders felt that these sources of risk could be addressed by research studies, education and changes to legislation. Stakeholders also believed that IMTA could contribute to improving the image of the aquaculture industry. For IMTA to successfully move forward from pilot scale to commercial scale development, it is imperative that the issues raised in this study form priorities for reform and action.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.006

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.006;
PII
S1462-9011(15)30075-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Science and Policy
Journal Volume
55
Journal Issue
Part 1
Journal Page Range
p. 96-106
ISSN
1462-9011

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49061208
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
AQUACULTURE; BENTHOS; CONTAINMENT; DISEASES; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENT; FOOD; HAZARDS; SAFETY; SEAS; SUSTAINABILITY; WASTES
Descriptors DEC
AQUATIC ORGANISMS; SURFACE WATERS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.