Published January 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of T2-W MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for the early post-treatment local response assessment of patients treated conservatively for cervical cancer. A multicentre study

  • 1. Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiology, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  • 2. Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  • 3. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiology, Leuven (Belgium)
  • 4. Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Gynecology, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  • 5. Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  • 6. University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 7. University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 8. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiotherapy, Leuven (Belgium)
  • 9. University of Amsterdam, Department of Gynecology Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 10. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gynecology, Leuven (Belgium)
  • 11. Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology, Rotterdam (Netherlands)

Description

To compare MR imaging with or without DWI and clinical response evaluation (CRE) in the local control evaluation of cervical carcinoma after radiotherapy. In a multicentre university setting, we prospectively included 107 patients with primary cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy. Sensitivity and specificity for CRE and MR imaging (with pre-therapy MR imaging as reference) (2 readers) were evaluated using cautious and strict criteria for identifying residual tumour. Nested logistic regression models were constructed for CRE, subsequently adding MR imaging with and without DWI as independent variables, as well as the pre- to post-treatment change in apparent diffusion coefficient (delta ADC). Using cautious criteria, CRE and MR imaging with DWI (reader 1/reader 2) have comparable high specificity (83% and 89%/95%, respectively), whereas MR imaging without DWI showed significantly lower specificity (63%/53%) than CRE. Using strict criteria, CRE and MR imaging with DWI both showed very high specificity (99% and 92%/95%, respectively), whereas MR imaging without DWI showed significantly lower specificity (89%/77%) than CRE. All sensitivities were not significantly different. Addition of MR imaging with DWI to CRE has statistically significant incremental value in identifying residual tumour (reader 1: estimate, 1.06; p = 0.001) (reader 2: estimate, 0.62; p = 0.02). Adding the delta ADC did not have significant incremental value in detecting residual tumour. DWI significantly increases the specificity of MR imaging in the detection of local residual tumour. Furthermore, MR imaging with DWI has significant incremental diagnostic value over CRE, whereas adding the delta ADC has no incremental diagnostic value. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5510-3

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
29
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 309-318
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3