Published May 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Determining optimum insulation thickness by thermoeconomic analysis for a pipeline system in a subway central cooling system

  • 1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development, No. 2 Nengyuan Road, Wushan, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510640 (China)
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Science, No. 2 Nengyuan Road, Wushan, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510640 (China)
  • 3. Guangzhou Metro Group Co., Ltd., Tower A, Wansheng Square, No. 1238 Xingang East Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510330 (China)

Description

Highlights: • Determine OIT of a pipeline system using thermoeconomic analysis. • OIT is higher for exergoeconomic optimization than for energoeconomic optimization. • The cooling loss and the OITs significantly differ between the FCW and UCW. • EC method is a good way for economic impacts considered. • EPC method is a better choice for environmental advantages considered. Thermoeconomic analysis combines exergy and economic analysis to evaluate and improve the performance of energy systems. This study utilized exergetic production cost (EPC), based on combined exergy and life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA), to optimize the insulation thickness of a pipeline system with a variable secondary pump in a subway central cooling system. The effects of the selected variables on insulation thickness optimization were also investigated. The results of the EPC and energetic cost (EC) methods were compared using payback period and total environmental impact of the pipe system, respectively. Results showed that the optimum insulation thickness (OIT) is higher for exergoeconomic optimization than for energoeconomic optimization. EC method is a good way for economic impacts considered, while EPC method is a better choice for environmental advantages considered. Moreover, cooling loss and the OIT significantly differ between fresh and used chilled water. Therefore, the characteristics of the supply and return pipes should be jointly considered in calculating the insulation thickness.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.078

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.078;
PII
S1359431117361434;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Thermal Engineering
Journal Volume
136
Journal Page Range
p. 454-461
ISSN
1359-4311
CODEN
ATENFT

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53020806
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
COOLING; COOLING SYSTEMS; EXERGY; LIFE-CYCLE COST; LOSSES; OPTIMIZATION; PAYBACK PERIOD; PIPELINES; PIPES; PUMPS; THICKNESS
Descriptors DEC
COST; DIMENSIONS; ENERGY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT; TUBES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.