Stakeholder engagement in radiological protection: Developing theory, practice and guidelines
Creators
- 1. SCK-CEN - Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Boeretang 200, Mol (Belgium)
- 2. CEPN - Nuclear Protection Evaluation Centre, 28 rue de la Redoute, 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)
- 3. EIMV - Milan Vidmar Electric Power Research Institute, Hajdrihova 2, Ljubljana (Slovenia)
- 4. VUJE - Okruzna 5, 918 64 Trnava (Slovakia)
- 5. BfS - Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Willy-Brandt-Strasse 5, Salzgitter (Germany)
Description
The ENGAGE project, funded under the H2020 CONCERT, aimed at 'Enhancing stakeholder participation in the Governance of radiological risks for improved radiation protection and informed decision-making'. To cover the aforementioned gaps, ENGAGE investigated the formal or informal demands and expectations for stakeholder engagement, and how these are translated into practices at national and local levels. It addressed three contexts of exposure to ionising radiation: nuclear emergency preparedness, response and recovery, exposure to indoor radon; and medical exposures to ionising radiation. The objectives of ENGAGE were to analyse formal discourses prescribing or recommending engagement; highlight forms of stakeholder engagement that can be observed in practice, and potential gaps between prescriptions and practices; investigate the role and potential benefit of radiation protection culture in facilitating stakeholder engagement and informed decision-making; and design a knowledge base and formulate recommendations for a more robust stakeholder engagement in radiation protection. The European project ENGAGE investigated formal or informal demands and expectations for stakeholder engagement in radiological protection, and their translation into practices at national and local levels. Three contexts were examined in detail: nuclear emergency preparedness, response and recovery; exposure to indoor radon; and medical exposures to ionising radiation. Research showed that prescriptions and practices for stakeholder engagement would benefit from acknowledging the normative and substantive rationales for engagement. It suggests broadening participation both in terms of stakeholders - particularly from the perspective of integration of radiological protection into broader frameworks - and the forms of participation - for instance by recognising the importance of informal and citizen-led engagement. In addition, more systematic approaches for stakeholder engagement should be included in the elaboration and evaluation of national policies. Finally, results substantiate the need for developing radiological protection culture in a participatory, multi-disciplinary way. Recommendations for more robust stakeholder engagement in radiological protection are formulated based on the findings. (authors)
Availability note (English)
Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020036Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radioprotection
- Journal Volume
- 55
- Journal Issue
- suppl.2
- Journal Page Range
- p. S211-S218
- ISSN
- 0033-8451
INIS
- Country of Publication
- France
- Country of Input or Organization
- France
- INIS RN
- 52098788
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMMUNICATIONS; DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; INDOOR AIR CONTAMINATION; IONIZING RADIATIONS; KNOWLEDGE BASE; PUBLIC OPINION; RADIATION ACCIDENTS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIATION HAZARDS; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADON; REACTOR ACCIDENTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; SURFACE CONTAMINATION
- Descriptors DEC
- ACCIDENTS; CONTAMINATION; DOSES; ELEMENTS; FLUIDS; GASES; HAZARDS; HEALTH HAZARDS; NONMETALS; RADIATIONS; RARE GASES
Optional Information
- Notes
- 44 refs.