Published March 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under ITER conditions

  • 1. General Atomics, PO Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608 (United States)
  • 2. Associazione Euratom-ENEA-CNR sulla Fusione, IFP-CNR, Milano (Italy)
  • 3. ITER International Team, Naka Joint Work Site, Ibaraki-ken (Japan)
  • 4. CompX PO Box 2672, Del Mar, CA 92014 (United States)
  • 5. Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States)
  • 6. Department of Physics, National Central University and National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan (China)
  • 7. Max Planck Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Garching (Germany)
  • 8. EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon (United Kingdom)
  • 9. FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen, Association EURATOM-FOM, Trilateral Euregio Cluster (Netherlands)
  • 10. Nuclear Fusion Institute, RRC 'Kurchatov Institute', 123128 Moscow (Russian Federation)

Description

Optimal design and use of electron cyclotron heating requires that accurate and relatively quick computer codes be available for prediction of wave coupling, propagation, damping and current drive at realistic levels of EC power. To this end, a number of codes have been developed in laboratories worldwide. A detailed comparison of these codes is desirable since they use a variety of methods for modelling the behaviour and effects of the waves. The approach used in this benchmarking study is to apply these codes to a small number of representative cases. Following minor remedial work on some codes, the agreement between codes for off-axis application is excellent. The largest systematic differences are found between codes with weakly relativistic and fully relativistic evaluation of the resonance condition, but even there the differences amount to less than 0.02 in normalized minor radius. For some other cases, for example for central current drive, the code results may differ significantly due to differences in the physics models used

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035006;
PII
S0029-5515(08)56426-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Fusion
Journal Volume
48
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 035006
ISSN
0029-5515
CODEN
NUFUAU

INIS

Optional Information