The politics of toxic waste
Description
Toxic waste, and the public policy that deals with it, is a complex issue. Much of the complexity stems from the science and technology embedded in the topic, but a great deal also results from the intricate interactions between the social organizations and institutions involved. The politics of toxic waste plays out within three key aspects of this complexity. The first of these is the nature of the intergovernmental relations involved. For toxic waste issues, these intergovernmental relations can be between sovereign states or between a nation and an international governing organization, or they may be restricted to a domestic context. If the later is the case, the relationship can be between federal, state, and local governments or between different bureaus, departments, or agencies within the same level of government. A second feature of this complexity can be seen in the consequences of divergent organizational or institutional interests. When conflicting organizational or institutional perspectives, positions, or concerns arise, public policy outcomes are affected.The tug and pull of competing actors move policy in the direction favored by the winner. This may or may not be the most rational alternative. A third aspect of this interorganizational puzzle involves the question of where the locus of authority for decisionmaking resides and to what extent stakeholders, who do not possess direct authority, can influence policy outcomes
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Policy Studies Journal
- Journal Volume
- 26
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 679-681
- ISSN
- 0190-292X
- CODEN
- PSJOD9
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 30038530
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; POLITICAL ASPECTS; PUBLIC POLICY; TOXIC MATERIALS; WASTES
- Descriptors DEC
- GOVERNMENT POLICIES; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS; MATERIALS