Characterization of site conditions (soil class, VS30, velocity profiles) for 33 stations from the French permanent accelerometric network (RAP) using surface-wave methods
Creators
- Hollender, Fabrice1
- Cornou, Cécile2
- Dechamp, Aline3
- Oghalaei, Kaveh2
- Renalier, Florence4
- Maufroy, Emeline2
- Burnouf, Clément5
- Thomassin, Sylvette6
- Wathelet, Marc2
- Bard, Pierre-Yves2
- Boutin, Vincent3
- Desbordes, Clément1
- Douste-Bacqué, Isabelle2
- Foundotos, Laetitia1
- Guyonnet-Benaize, Cédric1
- Perron, Vincent1
- Régnier, Julie7
- Roullé, Agathe8
- Langlais, Mickael2
- Sicilia, Deborah9
- 1. CEA, DEN (France)
- 2. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, ISTerre, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR (France)
- 3. CEA, DAM, DIF (France)
- 4. GeophyConsult (France)
- 5. SIXENSE Geophysics (France)
- 6. Résonance Ingénieurs-Conseils SA (Switzerland)
- 7. CEREMA, DTer Méditerranée (France)
- 8. BRGM, DRP/RSV (France)
- 9. EdF, DPI-CEIDRE (France)
Description
Data provided by accelerometric networks are important for seismic hazard assessment. The correct use of accelerometric signals is conditioned by the station site metadata quality (i.e., soil class, VS30, velocity profiles, and other relevant information that can help to quantify site effects). In France, the permanent accelerometric network consists of about 150 stations. Thirty-three of these stations in the southern half of France have been characterized, using surface-wave-based methods that allow derivation of velocity profiles from dispersion curves of surface waves. The computation of dispersion curves and their subsequent inversion in terms of shear-wave velocity profiles has allowed estimation of VS30 values and designation of soil classes, which include the corresponding uncertainties. From a methodological point of view, this survey leads to the following recommendations: (1) perform both active (multi-analysis surface waves) and passive (ambient vibration arrays) measurements to derive dispersion curves in a broadband frequency range; (2) perform active acquisitions for both vertical (Rayleigh wave) and horizontal (Love wave) polarities. Even when the logistic contexts are sometimes difficult, the use of surface-wave-based methods is suitable for station-site characterization, even on rock sites. In comparison with previous studies that have mainly estimated VS30 indirectly, the new values here are globally lower, but the EC8-A class sites remain numerous. However, even on rock sites, high frequency amplifications may affect accelerometric records, due to the shallow relatively softer layers.
Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering (Print)
- Journal Volume
- 16
- Journal Issue
- 6
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2337-2365
- ISSN
- 1570-761X
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 50012325
- Subject category
- S58: GEOSCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- AMPLIFICATION; CALCULATION METHODS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DISPERSIONS; FREQUENCY RANGE; LAYERS; RAYLEIGH WAVES; RECOMMENDATIONS; SEISMIC SURFACE WAVES; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SOILS; WAVE PROPAGATION
- Descriptors DEC
- EVALUATION; SEISMIC WAVES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)