Ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus surgery for solitary T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma in the danger triangle

To compare the safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) for thyroid papillary carcinoma (PTC) in the danger triangle area. The clinical data of 298 patients who underwent either percutaneous RFA or SR for PTC in the thyroid danger triangle at our hospital between January 2018 and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching is employed to regulate for confounding factors. All patients undergoing ablation were treated using a strategy that combined sufficient paratracheal fluid isolation with a low-power, short electrode. Disease progression was analyzed in patients with T1N0M0 PTC (T1a and T1b) employed in Kaplan--Meier curves. Treatment parameters and the rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and complications are recorded and compared. Of 182 eligible patients who were included, 91 were in the RFA (age 44.84 ± 13.19; 71 females; 77 T1a) and 91 were in the SR (age 47.36 ± 11.05; 68 females; 69 T1a). The average treatment time, length of hospital stays, blood loss volume, and scar length are substantially less in the RFA than in the SR. Major complications as well as postoperative permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and postoperative transient parathyroid dysfunction occurred only in the SR, with a substantial distinction between the two groups (p < 0.05). There is no substantial distinction in the disease progression between RFA and SR treatment of T1N0M0 PTC. RFA is as effective as surgery for PTC in the danger triangle area in the short term, with faster recovery and fewer complications. Radiofrequency ablation has a clinical efficacy comparable to surgery in the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma in the danger triangle area in the short term with the advantages of faster recovery and fewer complications when compared with surgery.