Published 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Assessing the debris generated by the small carry-on impactor operated from the Hayabusa2 mission

  • 1. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Nankoku, Kochi (Japan)
  • 2. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Biogeochemistry Research Center (BGC), Yokosuka, Kanagawa (Japan)
  • 3. Yokohama National University, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Yokohama, Kanagawa (Japan)

Description

We have analyzed the carbonaceous materials generated by the explosion of an High-melting explosive mixture in an Ar atmosphere in a laboratory simulation of the small carry-on impactor experiment. We used both non-destructive and destructive analytical techniques to identify the chemical nature of the materials. From SEM-EDS, we found the materials to be composed mainly of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, with a detectable amount of metals. Suitable parameters for identifying these materials are a FTIR peak at 1520 cm-1, low reflectance and gentle red slope of FTIR spectrum compared with the Murchison CM2 chondrite, the Raman D and G bands, and the hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen isotopic compositions and their spatial distributions. The scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM)-XANES results provided information about the molecular nature of these highly aromatic materials, which was supported by results from TD-GC/MS. These results suggest that it is possible to distinguish Ryugu samples from SCI potential contaminants in a sample container by using proper combinations of analytical techniques. This assessment provides information that will be useful for the analysis of the Ryugu asteroidal samples. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from DOI: https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.2.0632

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Geochemical Journal (Online)
Journal Volume
55
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 223-239
ISSN
1880-5973

Optional Information

Notes
43 refs., 9 figs., 2 tabs.