Published August 18, 1989 | Version v1
Journal article Metadata-only

Energetic future

Creators

Description

Reasons for the cut on SA output of uranium and indications that the market may recover soon are given. Arguments for the preference of nuclear power are discussed. Different types of reactors are also compared to evaluate it in terms of safety

Additional details

Additional titles

Augmented title (English)
Nuclear energy growth

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Financial Mail
Journal Volume
113
Journal Issue
6
Series
Article appears in Energy: a supplement to Financ. Mail.;Financ. Mail.
Journal Page Range
4, 7
ISSN
0015-2013
CODEN
FMAID

INIS

Country of Publication
South Africa
Country of Input or Organization
South Africa
INIS RN
21011477
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
BWR TYPE REACTORS; COST; ELECTRICITY; GAS COOLED REACTORS; MARKET; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER; POWER GENERATION; PWR TYPE REACTORS; REACTOR SAFETY; SOUTH AFRICA; URANIUM
Descriptors DEC
ACTINIDES; AFRICA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ELEMENTS; ENERGY; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; METALS; POWER; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; SAFETY; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS