Tumor Bed Delineation for Partial Breast and Breast Boost Radiotherapy Planned in the Prone Position: What Does MRI Add to X-ray CT Localization of Titanium Clips Placed in the Excision Cavity Wall?
Creators
- 1. Department of Academic Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton (United Kingdom)
- 2. Joint Departments of Radiotherapy and Physics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton (United Kingdom)
- 3. Department of Clinical Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton (United Kingdom)
Description
Purpose: To compare tumor bed (TB) volumes delineated using magnetic resonance imaging plus computed tomography and clips (MRCT) with those delineated using CT and clips (CT/clips) alone in postlumpectomy breast cancer patients positioned prone and to determine the value of MRCT for planning partial breast irradiation (PBI). Methods and Materials: Thirty women with breast cancer each had 6 to 12 titanium clips secured in the excision cavity walls at lumpectomy. Patients underwent CT imaging in the prone position, followed by MRI (T1-weighted [standard and fat-suppressed] and T2-weighted sequences) in the prone position. TB volumes were delineated separately on CT and on fused MRCT datasets. Clinical target volumes (CTV) (where CTV = TB + 15 mm) and planning target volumes (PTV) (where PTV = CTV + 10 mm) were generated. Conformity indices between CT- and MRCT-defined target volumes were calculated (ratio of the volume of agreement to total delineated volume). Discordance was expressed as a geographical miss index (GMI) (where the GMI = the fraction of total delineated volume not defined by CT) and a normal tissue index (the fraction of total delineated volume designated as normal tissue on MRCT). PBI dose distributions were generated to cover CT-defined CTV (CTVCT) with ≥95% of the reference dose. The percentage of MRCT-defined CTV (CTVMRCT) receiving ≥95% of the reference dose was measured. Results: Mean conformity indices were 0.54 (TB), 0.84 (CTV), and 0.89 (PTV). For TB volumes, the GMI was 0.37, and the NTI was 0.09. Median percentage volume coverage of CTVCT was 97.1% (range, 95.3%-100.0%) and of CTVMRCT was 96.5% (range, 89.0%-100.0%). Conclusions: Addition of MR to CT/clip data generated TB volumes that were discordant with those based on CT/clips alone. However, clinically satisfactory coverage of CTVMRCT by CTVCT-based tangential PBI fields provides support for CT/clip-based TB delineation remaining the method of choice for PBI/breast boost radiotherapy planned using tangential fields.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.028Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.028;
- PII
- S0360-3016(09)00244-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Journal Volume
- 74
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1276-1282
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- CODEN
- IOBPD3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 41024379
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CAVITIES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IRRADIATION; MAMMARY GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING; PATIENTS; PLANNING; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; TITANIUM; X RADIATION
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DOSES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; GLANDS; IONIZING RADIATIONS; MEDICINE; METALS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIATIONS; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSITION ELEMENTS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.