Published July 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Resident perceptions of the impacts of large-scale sugarcane production on ecosystem services in two regions of Brazil

Description

Highlights: • The study presents local perceptions of impacts of sugarcane production on ecosystem services in two municipalities in Brazil. • The assessment is based on interviews, and perceptions between the two studied regions vary and are affected by the different connections with the landscape. • The negative effects of sugarcane farming can be reduced by adopting best agricultural practices and promoting law enforcement. • Assessments such as the one described in this study are important in defining policies and planning land uses aiming at enhancing the sustainability of biofuel production. - Abstract: Sugarcane ethanol is an alternative to fossil fuels that can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and offer socioeconomic benefits, but at the same time have a series of negative impacts. Brazil is the second largest producer of fuel ethanol globally, with this production predicted to almost double over the next 15 years. However sugarcane ethanol production in the country has been shown to interact with a range of ecosystem services. It is only when such interactions are understood that we can fully determine the potential trade-offs, synergies and sustainability outcomes of biofuel production in the country. This paper explores the local perceptions about the impacts of sugarcane production on ecosystem services in two municipalities in the state of Sao Paulo with significant sugarcane production: Capivari and Rancharia. Impact perceptions have been elicited through interviews with local residents, with the results showing that perceptions vary between the two study sites and are affected considerably by the different local experiences with sugarcane production. For example, although sugarcane farming has been traditionally performed in Capivari, it has been Rancharia that has experienced more recently a rapid sugarcane expansion that has caused considerable changes in land use and farming patterns. Interview results also suggest that the negative effects of sugarcane farming can be reduced through the adoption of good agricultural practices and the enforcement of existing laws, as many respondents cited considerable improvements in ecosystem health from such actions. Assessing the perception of local communities such as the one reported in this paper can be crucial in designing policies and planning land uses that enhance the sustainability of biofuel production.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.029

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.029;
PII
S0961953417302817;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Journal Volume
114
Journal Page Range
p. 63-72
ISSN
0961-9534
CODEN
BMSBEO

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50070428
Subject category
S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
Descriptors DEI
BIOFUELS; BRAZIL; ECOSYSTEMS; ETHANOL; FARMS; GREENHOUSE GASES; LAND USE; SUGAR CANE; SUSTAINABILITY
Descriptors DEC
ALCOHOLS; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FUELS; GRAMINEAE; HYDROXY COMPOUNDS; LATIN AMERICA; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PLANTS; REEDS; SOUTH AMERICA

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.