Published August 1, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

The Role of Dual-Time Combined 18-Fluorideoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in the Staging and Restaging Workup of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy and Radical Surgery

  • 1. Department of Radiotherapy, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 2. Nuclear Medicine Service, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 3. Department of Oncology, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 4. Department of Surgery, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 5. Department of Clinical Pathology, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 6. Department of GastroEnterology, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 7. Department of Radiology, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 8. Department of Medical Physics, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)
  • 9. Department of Psychiatry, State Hospital, Rovigo (Italy)

Description

Purpose: In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) staging and, after preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (CRT), restaging workup could be useful to tailor therapeutic approaches. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) is a promising tool for monitoring the effect of antitumor therapy. This study was aimed to evaluate the possible role of dual time sequential FDG-PET scans in the staging and restaging workup of LARC. Methods and Materials: Eighty-seven consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled. CRT consisted of external-beam intensified radiotherapy (concurrent boost), with concomitant chemotherapy PVI 5-FU (300mg/m2/day) followed 8-10 weeks later by surgery. All patients underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT before and 5-6 weeks later after the completion of CRT. Measurements of FDG uptake (SUVmax), and percentage of SUVmax difference (Response Index = RI) between pre- and post-CRT [18F]FDG-PET scans were evaluated. Results: Six of 87 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. Following CRT, 40/81 patients (49%) were classified as responders according to Mandard's criteria (TRG1-2). The mean pre-CRT SUVmax was significantly higher than post-CRT (15.8, vs 5.9; p < 0.001). The mean RI was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponder patients (71.3% vs 38%; p = 0.0038). Using a RI cut-off of 65% for defining response to therapy, the following parameters have been obtained: 84.5% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 81.4% positive predictive value, 84.2% negative predictive value, and 81% overall accuracy. Conclusion: These results suggest the potential role of [18F]FDG-PET in the restaging workup after preoperative CRT in LARC. RI seems the best predictor to identify CRT response.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.064

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.064;
PII
S0360-3016(08)03719-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
74
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 1461-1469
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.