Published June 15, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Simultaneous integrated boost for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer- intensity modulated vs. conventional radiotherapy: The IMRT-MC2 trial

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135 Mannheim (Germany)
  • 3. University Breast Center, Department of Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Vossstr. 9, 69115 Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 4. Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, University of Heidelberg, Vossstr. 2, 69115 Heidelberg (Germany)

Description

Radiation therapy is an essential modality in the treatment of breast cancer. Addition of radiotherapy to surgery has significantly increased local control and survival rates of the disease. However, radiotherapy is also associated with side effects, such as tissue fibrosis or enhanced vascular morbidity. Modern radiotherapy strategies, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), can shorten the overall treatment time by integration of the additional tumor bed boost significantly. To what extent this might be possible without impairing treatment outcome and cosmetic results remains to be clarified. The IMRT-MC2 study is a prospective, two armed, multicenter, randomized phase-III-trial comparing intensity modulated radiotherapy with integrated boost to conventional radiotherapy with consecutive boost in patients with breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. 502 patients will be recruited and randomized into two arms: patients in arm A will receive IMRT in 28 fractions delivering 50.4 Gy to the breast and 64.4 Gy to the tumor bed by integrated boost, while patients in arm B will receive conventional radiotherapy of the breast in 28 fractions to a dose of 50.4 Gy and consecutive boost in 8 fractions to a total dose of 66.4 Gy. Primary objectives of the study are the evaluation of the cosmetic results 6 weeks and 2 years post treatment and the 2- and 5-year local recurrence rates for the two different radiotherapy strategies. Secondary objectives are long term overall survival, disease free survival and quality of life. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01322854

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-249; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3150341

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
BMC cancer (Online)
Journal Volume
11
Journal Page Range
p. 249
ISSN
1471-2407

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46102539
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ARMS; DISEASE INCIDENCE; DOSES; FIBROSIS; MAMMARY GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; SIDE EFFECTS; STANDARD OF LIVING; SURGERY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; GLANDS; LIMBS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c)2011 Askoxylakis et al
Notes
PMCID: PMC3150341; PUBLISHER-ID: 1471-2407-11-249; PMID: 21676232; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3150341; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.