Published September 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Fuzzy probability on reliability study of nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment: A review

  • 1. Center for Nuclear Reactor Safety and Technology, National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN), Kawasan Puspiptek Gd. 80 Setu, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, 15310 (Indonesia)

Description

Highlights: • Based on fuzzy implementation, two types of fault tree analysis have been reviewed. • The strengths and weaknesses of each type are discussed. • Use fuzzy based FTA when uncertainties are the main focus of the analysis. • Use fuzzy hybrid FTA when experts need to evaluate reliabilities of basic events. - Abstract: Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a graphical model which has been widely used as a deductive tool for nuclear power plant (NPP) probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). The conventional one assumes that basic events of fault trees always have precise failure probabilities or failure rates. However, in real-world applications, this assumption is still arguable. For example, there is a case where an extremely hazardous accident has never happened or occurs infrequently. Therefore, reasonable historical failure data are unavailable or insufficient to be used for statistically estimating the reliability characteristics of their components. To deal with this problem, fuzzy probability approaches have been proposed and implemented. However, those existing approaches still have limitations, such as lack of fuzzy gate representations and incapability to generate probabilities greater than 1.0E-3. Therefore, a review on the current implementations of fuzzy probabilities in the NPP PSA is necessary. This study has categorized two types of fuzzy probability approaches, i.e. fuzzy based FTA and fuzzy hybrid FTA. This study also confirms that the fuzzy based FTA should be used when the uncertainties are the main focus of the FTA. Meanwhile, the fuzzy hybrid FTA should be used when the reliability of basic events of fault trees can only be expressed by qualitative linguistic terms rather than numerical values.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.05.010

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.05.010;
PII
S0149197014001292;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Journal Volume
76
Journal Page Range
p. 73-80
ISSN
0149-1970

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
51012805
Subject category
S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Descriptors DEI
ACCIDENTS; FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; FUZZY LOGIC; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATION; RELIABILITY; REVIEWS; RISK ASSESSMENT
Descriptors DEC
CALCULATION METHODS; DOCUMENT TYPES; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; SYSTEM FAILURE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Notes
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.