A revisit of fossil-fuel subsidies in China: Challenges and opportunities for energy price reform
Creators
- 1. Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy, China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005 (China)
- 2. Newhuadu Business School, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108 (China)
- 3. School of Energy Research, College of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005 (China)
Description
Highlights: • We measure fossil-fuel subsidies and effects of subsidy removal in a systematic fashion during 2006–2010. • Fossil-fuel subsidies scale of China was CNY 881.94 billion in 2010, equivalent to 2.59% of GDP. • Impacts of removing subsidies on macroeconomic variables are examined by the CGE model. • Future policy should focus on designing transparent, targeted and efficient energy subsidies. - Abstract: Fossil-fuel subsidies contribute to the extensive growth of energy demand and the related carbon dioxide emissions in China. However, the process of energy price reform is slow, even though China faces increasing problems of energy scarcity and environmental deterioration. This paper focuses on analyzing fossil fuel subsidies in China by estimating subsidies scale and the implications for future reform. We begin by measuring fossil-fuel subsidies and the effects of subsidy removal in a systematic fashion during 2006–2010 using a price-gap approach. Results indicate that the oil price reform in 2009 significantly reduced China's fossil-fuel subsidies and modified the subsidy structure. Fossil-fuel subsidies scale in China was 881.94 billion CNY in 2010, which was lower than the amount in 2006, equivalent to 2.59% of the GDP. The macro-economic impacts of removing fossil-fuel subsidies are then evaluated by the computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Results demonstrate that the economic growth and employment will be negatively affected as well as energy demand, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide emissions. Finally, policy implications are suggested: first, risks of government pricing of energy are far from negligible; second, an acceptable macroeconomic impact is a criterion for energy price reform in China; third, the future energy policy should focus on designing transparent, targeted and efficient energy subsidies
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.030Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.030;
- PII
- S0196-8904(14)00222-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Journal Volume
- 82
- Journal Page Range
- p. 124-134
- ISSN
- 0196-8904
- CODEN
- ECMADL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46025394
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON DIOXIDE; CHINA; DESIGN; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENERGY DEMAND; ENERGY POLICY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; FOSSIL FUELS; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; OILS; PRICES
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; DEMAND; ENERGY SOURCES; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OTHER ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.