Published December 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Contributions of volatilization, photolysis, and biodegradation to N‑nitrosodimethylamine removal in conventional drinking water treatment plants

  • 1. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084 (China)
  • 2. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Peking University, Beijing 100871 (China)
  • 3. Research Institute for Environmental Innovation (Suzhou), Tsinghua, Suzhou 215163 (China)
  • 4. La Verne, CA 91750 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • NDMA could be degraded during water treatment processes. • Photolysis plays the most important role in removing NDMA in conventional DWTPs. • NDMA removal in biotreatment can't be ignored and needs further investigation. • Volatilization presented negligible NDMA removal. -- Abstract: N‑nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) was detected in the source water of some Chinese drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs), which decreased in concentration along the treatment train. Volatilization, photolysis, and/or biodegradation were suspected of being capable of attenuating NDMA. In this study, the contribution of these mechanisms to NDMA removal was investigated by a field study in a conventional DWTP with aerated bio-pretreatment, as well as in laboratory-based experiments. The effluent of each unit process (i.e., aerated bio-pretreatment tank, horizontal sedimentation tank, sand filter) of this DWTP was sampled in the winter and summer, and the concentration of NDMA, its formation potential, and other water quality parameters were measured. NDMA removal by volatilization and biodegradation was simulated in batch experiments, and that by photolysis was calculated with parameters reported in the literature. The sampling results indicated that the aerated biofilm reactor of this DWTP removed 48% of the NDMA in August and 22% in December. According to modeling results, it could be well explained by photolysis (NDMA removal of 51% in summer and 25% in winter) and biotreatment (NDMA removal of 0.2–12% in summer and 0.1–6.1% in winter), with little contribution from aeration (NDMA removal of 0.8%). The sampling results indicated that the sedimentation tank removed 19% of NDMA in August and 9.2% in December. According to modeling results, it could be well explained by photolysis (NDMA removal of 16% in August and 9.4% in December), but little by volatilization. Thus, photolysis was shown to be the most important process for NDMA removal in this DWTP. Further investigation is needed to better understand NDMA removal during biotreatment.

Additional details

Additional titles

Augmented title (English)
Volatilization;Photolysis;Biodegradation;Drinking water treatment plants

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133993;
PII
S0048969719339701;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
697
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.