On the importance of the long-term seasonal component in day-ahead electricity price forecasting Part II — Probabilistic forecasting
- 1. Faculty of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław (Poland)
- 2. Department of Operations Research, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław (Poland)
Description
Highlights: • A new class of 'probabilistic' SCARX models is introduced. • SCARX models significantly outperform the ARX benchmark. • But are in turn outperformed by combined SCARX forecasts. • QRA outperforms historical simulation and bootstrap in probabilistic forecasting. • Averaging over distributions yields better probabilistic forecasts than averaging over quantiles. -- Abstract: A recent electricity price forecasting study has shown that the Seasonal Component AutoRegressive (SCAR) modeling framework, which consists of decomposing a series of spot prices into a trend-seasonal and a stochastic component, modeling them independently and then combining their forecasts, can yield more accurate point predictions than an approach in which the same autoregressive model is calibrated to the prices themselves. Here, we show that further accuracy gains can be achieved when the explanatory variables (load forecasts) are deseasonalized as well. More importantly, considering a novel extension of the SCAR concept to probabilistic forecasting and applying two methods of combining predictive distributions, we find that (i) SCAR-type models nearly always significantly outperform the autoregressive benchmark but are in turn outperformed by combined SCAR forecasts, (ii) predictive distributions computed using Quantile Regression Averaging (QRA) outperform those obtained from historical simulation and bootstrap methods, and (iii) averaging over predictive distributions generally yields better probabilistic forecasts of electricity spot prices than averaging over quantiles. Given that probabilistic forecasting is a concept closely related to risk management, our study has important implications for risk officers and portfolio managers in the power sector.
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.007;
- PII
- S0140988318300653;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Economics
- Journal Volume
- 79
- Journal Page Range
- p. 171-182
- ISSN
- 0140-9883
- CODEN
- EECODR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55014466
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- BENCHMARKS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; ELECTRICITY; PRICES; PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES
- Descriptors DEC
- CALCULATION METHODS; SIMULATION
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.