Optimal electric vehicle production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling
Creators
- 1. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074 (China)
- 2. School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081 (China)
- 3. School of Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074 (China)
Description
Government subsidy and battery recycling are two common practical issues in the electric vehicle (EV) market. This study investigates a loss-averse EV manufacturer's optimal production strategy under uncertain market demand in the presence of both government subsidy and battery recycling. An analytical model is built and related optimal solution and numerical experiments are provided. Results indicate that increased subsidy promotes the manufacturer's optimal production quantity and expected utility. Increased battery recycling rate promotes the manufacturer's optimal production quantity. However, the manufacturer's expected utility decreases with the battery recycling rate if the optimal production quantity is sufficiently small. This result implies that the manufacturer may prefer a relatively small battery recycling rate when the market scale is small. Consequently, the government should establish regulations to promote battery recycling for environmental protection. We find that either subsidy or battery recycling can offset the negative effects of loss aversion on the optimal production quantity and expected utility. The majority of our results still hold if we consider multiple repurposing options for used batteries or an alternative subsidy mechanism. In particular, the manufacturer's optimal production quantity and expected utility are higher under cost subsidy mechanism than under consumer subsidy mechanism. - Highlights: • Characterize the optimal EV production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling. • Impacts of subsidy, battery recycling and loss aversion are correlated. • Higher battery recycling rate may decrease the EV manufacturer's expected utility. • Effects of different subsidy mechanisms on EV production strategy are analyzed.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.043Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.043;
- PII
- S0301-4215(17)30475-5;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 109
- Journal Page Range
- p. 579-589
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49057446
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ELECTRIC BATTERIES; ELECTRIC POWER; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ELECTRIC-POWERED VEHICLES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; GAS UTILITIES; LOSSES; MANUFACTURERS; MARKET; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; RECYCLING
- Descriptors DEC
- ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS; ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS; ENERGY SYSTEMS; POWER; PUBLIC UTILITIES; VEHICLES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.