Published June 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Adapting electricity markets to decarbonisation and security of supply objectives: Toward a hybrid regime?

  • 1. Associate Professor, CGEMP, Université Paris Dauphine and researcher of 'Chair European Electricity markets' (CEEM) of Paris Dauphine University (France)
  • 2. Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnementet le Développement (CIRED) and Chaire European Electricity Markets (CEEM), Paris Dauphine University (France)

Description

The policy objectives of decarbonisation of the electricity sector whilst maintaining security of supply have led to a new wave of market reforms in many jurisdictions which liberalised their industry. There is a wide range of models under this new hybrid regime which essentially combine the energy market with planning and long-term risk transfer arrangements. This paper takes an institutionalist approach in terms of modularity of the market design, and reviews the issues with the standard historical market model which led to the introduction of additional long term "modules". We then study the interactions between the existing and new "modules" and identify ways in which the initial market modules can be improved to address inconsistencies with the new modules. We conclude by discussing the conditions under which the various changes in market architectures could converge toward a hybrid regime structured around a "two step competition", with a "competition for the market" via the auctioning of long-term contracts to support investment, followed by "competition in the market" for short term system optimisation via the energy market. - Highlights: • The policy objectives of decarbonisation of the electricity sector whilst maintaining security of supply have led to a new wave of markets reforms. • Emergence of a hybrid regime combining the energy market with planning and long-term risk transfer arrangements. • Wide diversity of models in hybrid regimes, but some common fundamental features. • Replacement of the coordination function of energy prices for investment by some form of planning followed by long-term contracts. • Discussion of the conditions for possible convergence toward a "two step competition" regime.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.035

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.035;
PII
S0301-4215(17)30110-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
105
Journal Page Range
p. 584-596
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48086505
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AVAILABILITY; CARBON; COMPETITION; CONTRACTS; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY MODELS; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY SUPPLIES; HAZARDS; INVESTMENT; LEGAL ASPECTS; MARKET; OPTIMIZATION; PRICES; SECURITY
Descriptors DEC
ELEMENTS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NONMETALS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.