IUPAC STATUES AND BYLAWS
Description
from the history of the Commission, it began with a large number of members. It was found that it was difficult to gain agreement by correspondence between such a large group. A smaller group was elected to operate by correspondence and make decisions. It operated successfully for a half century in this manner. With funding available, the Commission membership grew larger but they.discussed all matters face to face at Commission meetings. Subcommittees were appointed to pursue specialized topics and members reported and discussed their subcommittee results directly to the Commission at the face to face meetings. With the change in the bylaws, future face to face meetings will no longer be an option for the members of the Commission and its subcommittees, unless all members provide their own funds or those of their host institutions. The funding and membership restrictions are all serious topics, which require a thorough discussion
Availability note (English)
Available from PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/15006609-oav5Fl/native/Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 6 p.
- Report number
- BNL--71593-2003-CP
Conference
- Title
- 42. IUPAC GENERAL ASSEMBLY
- Dates
- 8-17 Aug 2003
- Place
- OTTAWA, ONTARIO (Canada)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 35030890
- Subject category
- S99: GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference, Non-conventional Literature
- Descriptors DEI
- INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; LAWS; LEGAL ASPECTS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; RECOMMENDATIONS
- Descriptors DEC
- MATERIALS
Optional Information
- Contract/Grant/Project number
- KB0301042; AC02-98CH10886
- Funding organization
- DOE/SC (United States)