Published 1977 | Version v1
Report

Fuel cycle technical options for controlling nuclear proliferation

Creators

Description

One near term alternative might be enhanced burn-up and improved conversion ratios in light water reactors (LWR's). A second possibility might be use of heavy water reactors. The Tandem Fuel Cycle Concept is discussed. Under this concept, spent fuel from LWR's would be reclad and used directly to fuel natural uranium heavy water reactors, eliminating the need for chemical separation of plutonium from the spent LWR fuel. Another possible alternative to reprocessing is coprocessing, sometimes called ''fission product stripping.'' This procedure would chemically separate both plutonium and uranium from waste products in the spent fuel, but the plutonium and uranium would not be separated from each other. The plutonium and uranium mix could then be recycled as fuel for nuclear power reactors. Combining coprocessing and the tandem cycle is another alternative

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
Proceedings of the conference on international commerce and safeguards for civil nuclear power
Journal Page Range
p. 22p, Paper 13.
Report number
CONF-770387--

Conference

Title
Conference on international commerce and safeguards for civil nuclear power.
Dates
13 - 16 Mar 1977.
Place
New York, NY, USA.

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
9389989
Subject category
S98: NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
FUEL CYCLE; NUCLEAR WEAPONS; PROLIFERATION; SAFEGUARDS