Published April 21, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

Registration of DRRs and portal images for verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy: a feasibility study in lung cancer treatment

  • 1. Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna (Austria)
  • 2. Department of Radiotherapy, St Elisabeth Institute of Oncology, Bratislava (Slovakia)
  • 3. Center for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Medical University Vienna, Vienna (Austria)

Description

Image guidance has become a pre-requisite for hypofractionated radiotherapy where the applied dose per fraction is increased. Particularly in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumours, one has to account for set-up errors and intrafraction tumour motion. In our feasibility study, we compared digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of lung lesions with MV portal images (PIs) to obtain the displacement of the tumour before irradiation. The verification of the tumour position was performed by rigid intensity based registration and three different merit functions such as the sum of squared pixel intensity differences, normalized cross correlation and normalized mutual information. The registration process then provided a translation vector that defines the displacement of the target in order to align the tumour with the isocentre. To evaluate the registration algorithms, 163 test images were created and subsequently, a lung phantom containing an 8 cm3 tumour was built. In a further step, the registration process was applied on patient data, containing 38 tumours in 113 fractions. To potentially improve registration outcome, two filter types (histogram equalization and display equalization) were applied and their impact on the registration process was evaluated. Generated test images showed an increase in successful registrations when applying a histogram equalization filter whereas the lung phantom study proved the accuracy of the selected algorithms, i.e. deviations of the calculated translation vector for all test algorithms were below 1 mm. For clinical patient data, successful registrations occurred in about 59% of anterior-posterior (AP) and 46% of lateral projections, respectively. When patients with a clinical target volume smaller than 10 cm3 were excluded, successful registrations go up to 90% in AP and 50% in lateral projection. In addition, a reliable identification of the tumour position was found to be difficult for clinical target volumes at the periphery of the lung, close to backbone or diaphragm. Moreover, tumour movement during shallow breathing strongly influences image acquisition for patient positioning. Recapitulating, 2D/3D image registration for lung tumours is an attractive alternative compared to conventional CT verification of the tumour position. Nevertheless, size and location of the tumour are limiting parameters for an accurate registration process

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/008;
PII
S0031-9155(07)31641-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Journal Volume
52
Journal Issue
8
Journal Page Range
p. 2157-2170
ISSN
0031-9155
CODEN
PHMBA7

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
38072562
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; ALGORITHMS; CARCINOMAS; DIAPHRAGM; ERRORS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; IMAGES; LUNGS; PATIENTS; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; VERIFICATION
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; DOSES; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICINE; MOCKUP; MUSCLES; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; STRUCTURAL MODELS; THERAPY