Modeling free surface flows relevant to a PTS scenario: Comparison between experimental data and three RANS based CFD-codes. Comments on the CFD-experiment integration and best practice guideline
- 1. UCL Universite catholique de Louvain, Institute of Mechanics, Materials and Civil Engineering (iMMC), Place du Levaant 2, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium)
- 2. Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf e.V., Institute of Safety Research, P.O. Box 51 01 19, 01314 Dresden (Germany)
- 3. EDF - Fluid Dynamics Power Generation Environment, 6 quai Watier, 78401 Chatou (France)
Description
This paper presents some results concerning a benchmark for stratified two-phase flows conducted in the frame of the European Platform for NUclear REactor SIMulations (NURESIM). This benchmark relies on the FZD slug flow experiment performed in the horizontal air/water channel (HAWAC). For this benchmark special experimental arrangements have been taken in order to be able to properly model the boundary and initial conditions with CFD. A picture sequence recorded with a high-speed camera was used as reference for comparison with the simulations. For this benchmark, three different codes have been tried out. CFX was used with a turbulent two-fluid model in which a special turbulence damping function was implemented in the specific dissipation rate of the turbulent kinetic energy. This allowed a good qualitative representation of the slug dynamics, even though quantitative comparison were less successful because of difficulties in modeling the inlet instabilities. The VOF approach in its laminar and turbulent form was also tried out through the FLUENT code and was found to be inappropriate for those conditions due to the high velocity slip between phases. Moreover, NEPTUNECFD was tested with a newly implemented model allowing free surface location and the computation of momentum transfer across this interface. This Large Interface Model (LIM) is able to detect 'stratified cells' from the other and so that appropriate closure law can be applied. With this model, the results agreed well with experimental data qualitatively and quantitatively. This benchmark experience also allowed us to draw basis recommendations for a best practice guideline in numerical simulation related to free surface flows in nuclear thermal hydraulics.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.032Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.032;
- PII
- S0029-5493(10)00313-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Journal Volume
- 240
- Journal Issue
- 9
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2375-2381
- ISSN
- 0029-5493
- CODEN
- NEDEAU
Conference
- Title
- 2. workshop on experiments and CFD code applications to nuclear reactor safety
- Acronym
- XCFD4NRS
- Dates
- 10-12 Sep 2008
- Place
- Grenoble (France)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 42014697
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING; S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference, Numerical Data
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR; BENCHMARKS; CALCULATION METHODS; CAMERAS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; INTERFACES; KINETIC ENERGY; MOMENTUM TRANSFER; REACTOR SIMULATORS; RECOMMENDATIONS; SURFACES; THERMAL HYDRAULICS; THERMAL SHOCK; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW; TWO-PHASE FLOW; WATER
- Descriptors DEC
- ANALOG SYSTEMS; DATA; ENERGY; EVALUATION; FLUID FLOW; FLUID MECHANICS; FLUIDS; FUNCTIONAL MODELS; GASES; HYDRAULICS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; INFORMATION; MECHANICS; NUMERICAL DATA; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; SIMULATION; SIMULATORS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.