Published October 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Dose estimation outside radiation field using Pinpoint and Semiflex ionization chamber detectors

  • 1. Radiotherapy Department, Nasser Institute, Cairo (Egypt)
  • 2. National Cancer Institute, Cairo University (Egypt)
  • 3. Biophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University (Egypt)

Description

This work aims to provide a comparison between two important detectors (Pinpoint and Semiflex) that are frequently used in radiation dosimetery in radiotherapy. This is carried out through the employment of both detectors in a quantitative estimation of the change in out-of-field dose with important dosimetric parameters such as field size (from 5×5 cm2 to 30×30 cm2) and depth (from 1.5 cm to 30 cm) at two different energies (6 MV and 15 MV) and two different collimator angles (0–90°). The change in out-of-field dose with Source-Skin-Distance (SSD) from 80 to 115 cm is also studied using both detectors. Results show that, the Pinpoint and Semiflex detectors both reported an increase in out-of-field dose with field size, depth, energy and SSD. In almost all measurements, Pinpoint detector reported considerably higher out-of-field dose values compared to Semiflex. For 6 MV and 0° collimator angle, the out-of-field dose at field size of 30×30 cm2 and at a depth of 1.5 cm is 7.3% for Pinpoint detector compared to 4.3% for Semiflex. At collimator angle of 90°, the out-of-field dose is 6.5% for Pinpoint detector compared to 5.5% for semiflex. The out-of-field dose for a depth of 30 cm and field size of 10×10 cm is 7.9% for Pinpoint detector compared to 5.9% for Semiflex. For 15 MV and 0° collimator angle, the out-of-field dose at field size of 30×30 cm2 and at a depth of 1.5 cm is 7.5% for Pinpoint detector compared 5.1% for Semiflex. At 6 MV, field size of 10×10 cm2 and depth of 1.5 cm, the out-of-field dose at SSD 115 cm is 3.7% for Pinpoint detector compared to 3.4% for Semiflex. The considerably higher out-of-field dose values reported by Pinpoint detector compared to Semiflex may be attributed to the relatively higher sensitivity of Pinpoint detector for low doses (such as out-of-field doses). Therefore, for reliable out-of-field dose measurements a Pinpoint detector is highly recommended. - Highlights: • The out-of-field dose is measured using Pinpoint and Semiflex detectors. • This is carried out at different dosimetric parameters (field size, depth, energy, collimator angle and at different SSD). • The out-of-field dose increased with all of the given parameters using both detectors. • Pinpoint detector is found to be much more sensitive than Semiflex in out-of-field dose measurements.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.04.006

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.04.006;
PII
S0969-806X(17)30424-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Physics and Chemistry (1993)
Journal Volume
139
Journal Page Range
p. 120-125
ISSN
0969-806X
CODEN
RPCHDM

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49049635
Subject category
S38: RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY;
Descriptors DEI
DOSES; DOSIMETRY; IONIZATION CHAMBERS
Descriptors DEC
MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; RADIATION DETECTORS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.