The dose makes the poison
Creators
- 1. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 (China)
- 2. Donghu Experimental Station of Lake Ecosystems, State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072 (China)
- 3. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences and Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N5B3 (Canada)
- 4. State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining 810016 (China)
Description
Highlights: • A critical review of a previous study was performed. • Exposure to the same concentrations do not result in equivalent doses among species. • Inter-species variations should be considered in experimental design. • Ranges of low-dose for effects of microcystins in animals and humans should be defined. • Chronic toxicity and especially carcinogenicities of microcystins need further studies. Some microcystins (MCs) might cause hepatotoxicity in animals and humans. MC-LR is also a tumor promoter and a suspect carcinogen. In 2010, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified MC-LR as a possible human carcinogen (Group 2B). Recently, an article entitled "Long-term, low-dose exposure to microcystin toxin does not increase the risk of liver tumor development or growth in mice" was published in Hepatology Research by Meaghan Labine and Gerald Y. Minuk. However, the experimental design was flawed and the conclusion is misleading. 1 μg/L MC-LR in drinking water is the provisional guideline value established by the World Health Organization (WHO) for humans in 1998, based on a tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 0.04 μg/kg body mass (BM). Assuming the mice drink 1.5 mL/10 g BM of water per day, the exposure dose would be 0.15 μg/kg/d BM, about 270-fold less than 40 μg/kg/d, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL). Thus, the dose of MC-LR was too small and "unlikely to result in liver tumor development or enhance existing tumor growth", even with a long-term (28 weeks) exposure. Presumably, they didn't consider inter-species variations between mice and humans, including toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. Ranges of "low-dose" MCs for animals and humans should be defined. Also, the authors misunderstood or misrepresented several previous studies. Before drawing final conclusions on the carcinogenicity of MCs, further well-designed experiments are warranted.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.218Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.218;
- PII
- S004896971733276X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 621
- Journal Page Range
- p. 649-653
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53011520
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARCINOGENS; DRINKING WATER; ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION; HEALTH HAZARDS; HUMANS; LIVER; MICE; NEOPLASMS; REVIEWS; TOXICITY; TOXINS; TUMOR PROMOTERS; WHO
- Descriptors DEC
- ANIMALS; ANTIGENS; BODY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; GLANDS; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; HAZARDS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; MAMMALS; MATERIALS; ORGANS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PRIMATES; PROMOTERS; RODENTS; TOXIC MATERIALS; VERTEBRATES; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.