Case study: Findings and lessons learned from investigating a uranium intake and the corresponding dose calculations
Creators
- Beeslaar, Frik1
- Niekerk, Santie van1
- Steenkamp, Harry1
- Visagie, Abrie1
- International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA), Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)
- Sociedad Argentina de Radioproteccion (SAR), Buenos Aires (Argentina)
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (Austria)
- Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Washington, DC (United States)
- World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva (Switzerland)
- 1. South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa), Pretoria (South Africa). Safety, Health, Environmental and Quality Dept.
Description
Full text: Purpose: To discuss the findings of an investigation into uranium intake and to discuss the lessons learned from the subsequent bioassay monitoring and dose calculations. Method: An investigation was held to determine direct and root causes after elevated air concentration levels were reported during the execution of an ad-hoc task. A programme of bioassay monitoring (urine sampling and lung counts) was implemented for the involved staff and committed effective doses were calculated. Major findings of the investigation: a) Inadequate pre-task assessment led to hazards not being identified and subsequently proper control measures were not implemented; b) Inadequate localised control of contamination led to contamination of worker's clothes and faces and contamination of rest of area; c) Workers were complacent which led to a lapse in safety awareness and subsequently they removed their face masks during the task. Problems experienced with bioassay monitoring and dose calculations: a) Some bioassay samples were not taken or were given incorrectly; b) Calculating doses were difficult due to lack of information regarding date of intake; whether there were other possible intakes; and the physiochemical nature of the uranium; c) Weak correlation between predicted and actual bioassay data; d) Period between starting bioassay monitoring and the actual event was too long. Conclusions: a) Shortcomings in the control of contamination with protective clothing and during the execution of ad-hoc tasks; b) Identifying hazards and assessing it is extremely dependant on the skill and capabilities if the Radiation Protection Officers; c) Instructions to workers regarding sampling of urine and arrangements around the sampling should be very specific with only one person responsible for managing the process; d) Be aware of the psychological impact on the affected workers; e) 2 nd Independent dose calculation important for verifying doses; f) Detection capabilities and bioassay methods not adequate for monitoring intake of S-type uranium. (author)
Files
43004071.pdf
Files
(28.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b60528d2908bace02c0e453cb9de6b16
|
28.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- SAR
- Imprint Place
- Buenos Aires (Argentina)
- Imprint Pagination
- 1 p.
- Report number
- INIS-AR-C--1420
Conference
- Title
- 12. International congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA): Strengthening radiation protection worldwide
- Acronym
- IRPA 12
- Dates
- 19-24 Oct 2008
- Place
- Buenos Aires (Argentina)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Argentina
- Country of Input or Organization
- Argentina
- INIS RN
- 43004071
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOASSAY; CONTAMINATION; INTAKE; LUNGS; MONITORING; PERSONNEL; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING; RADIATION DOSES; SAMPLING; URANIUM; URINE
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDES; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOLOGICAL WASTES; BODY; BODY FLUIDS; CLOTHING; DOSES; ELEMENTS; MATERIALS; METALS; ORGANS; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; WASTES
Optional Information
- Notes
- Abstract only