Published May 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

When Are LIGO/Virgo's Big Black Hole Mergers?

  • 1. Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA) and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, 1800 Sherman Ave., Evanston, IL 60201 (United States)
  • 2. Institute for Fundamental Science, Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 (United States)
  • 3. Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY 10010 (United States)
  • 4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794 (United States)
  • 5. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 (United States)

Description

We study the evolution of the binary black hole (BBH) mass distribution across cosmic time. The second gravitational-wave transient catalog (GWTC-2) from LIGO/Virgo contains BBH events out to redshifts z ∼ 1, with component masses in the range ∼5–80 M . In this catalog, the biggest BBHs, with m 1 ≳ 45 M , are only found at the highest redshifts, z ≳ 0.4. We ask whether the absence of high-mass observations at low redshift indicates that the mass distribution evolves: the biggest BBHs only merge at high redshift, and cease merging at low redshift. Modeling the BBH primary-mass spectrum as a power law with a sharp maximum mass cutoff (Truncated model), we find that the cutoff increases with redshift (> 99.9% credibility). An abrupt cutoff in the mass spectrum is expected from (pulsational) pair-instability supernova simulations; however, GWTC-2 is only consistent with a Truncated mass model if the location of the cutoff increases from 45 5 + 13 M at z < 0.4 to 80 13 + 16 M at z > 0.4. Alternatively, if the primary-mass spectrum has a break in the power law (Broken Power Law) at 38 8 + 15 M , rather than a sharp cutoff, the data are consistent with a nonevolving mass distribution. In this case, the overall rate of mergers, at all masses, increases with redshift. Future observations will distinguish between a sharp mass cutoff that evolves with redshift and a nonevolving mass distribution with a gradual taper, such as a Broken Power Law. After ∼100 BBH merger observations, a continued absence of high-mass, low-redshift events would provide a clear signature that the mass distribution evolves with redshift.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abee11

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Astrophysical Journal
Journal Volume
912
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
[12 p.]
ISSN
0004-637X
CODEN
ASJOAB

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53073352
Subject category
S79: ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
BLACK HOLES; GRAVITATIONAL WAVES; MASS DISTRIBUTION; RED SHIFT
Descriptors DEC
DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION