Published October 2001 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

Measuring and improving the public perceptions on nuclear energy

  • 1. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Taejon (Korea, Republic of)

Description

The purpose of this paper is to measure the public's perception on risk and benefit of nuclear power and to find ways to improve the perceptions. Latent Class Analysis is adopted for the perception measures, which quantify people's perception and reveal the perception structure. The measures resulted from Latent Class Analysis show that women perceive risks to be more existent and benefits to be less than men do. Moreover there is a tendency that if education level is high, perceived risk is low and perceived benefit is high. The perception of risk and benefit also depends on different channels through which people get information about nuclear energy. Comparing seven different information channels, the most effective ways of communicating with people to improve the risk and benefit perception of nuclear energy are found to be the visit to nuclear plants and the education through the regular schooling. Information dissemination through mass media is only effective to the benefit perception

Part of:
Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society autumn meeting

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
KNS
Imprint Place
Taejon (Korea, Republic of)
Imprint Title
Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society autumn meeting
Imprint Pagination
[CD-ROM]
Journal Page Range
[7 p.]

Conference

Title
2001 autumn meeting of the Korean Nuclear Society
Dates
24-26 Oct 2001
Place
Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

INIS

Country of Publication
Korea, Republic of
Country of Input or Organization
Korea, Republic of
INIS RN
33065753
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
HAZARDS; INFORMATION; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY; POWER

Optional Information

Notes
6 refs, 2 figs, 2 tabs