Published May 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Analysis of effective and organ dose estimation in CT when using mA modulation: A single scanner pilot study

Description

Introduction: Effective dose (ED) estimation in CT examinations can be obtained by combining dose length product (DLP) with published ED per DLP coefficients or performed using software. These methods do not account for tube current (mA) modulation which is influenced by patient size. The aim of the work was to compare different methods of organ and ED estimation to measured values when using mA modulation in CT chest, abdomen and pelvis examinations. Method: Organ doses from CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis were measured using digital dosimeters and a dosimetry phantom. ED was calculated. Six methods of estimating ED accounting for mA modulation were performed using ImPACT CTDosimetry and Dose Length Product to ED coefficients. Corrections for the phantom mass were applied resulting in 12 estimation methods. Estimated organ doses from ImPACT CTDosimtery were compared to measured values. Results: Calculated EDs were; chest 12.35 mSv (±1.48 mSv); abdomen 8.74 mSv (±1.36 mSv) and pelvis 4.68 mSv (±0.75 mSv). There was over estimation in all three anatomical regions. Correcting for phantom mass improved agreement between measured and estimated ED. Organ doses showed overestimation of dose inside the scan range and underestimation outside the scan range. Conclusion: Reasonable estimation of effective dose for CT of the chest and abdomen can be obtained using ImPACT CTDosimetry software or k-coefficients. Further work is required to improve the accuracy of ED estimation from CT of the pelvis. Accuracy of organ dose estimation has been shown to depend on the inclusion or exclusion of the organ from the scan range. - Highlights: • A comparison of methods for accounting for tube current modulation in effective dose estimation is made. • Accounting for and applying corrections for mass improves accuracy of dose estimations. • There is overestimation of organ dose inside the scan range and underestimation of organ dose outside the scan range.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.02.006

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radi.2017.02.006;
PII
S1078-8174(17)30011-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiography (London 1995)
Journal Volume
23
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 159-166
ISSN
1078-8174

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49034547
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ABDOMEN; ACCOUNTING; ACCURACY; CHEST; COMPUTER CODES; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRECTIONS; DOSEMETERS; DOSIMETRY; ORGANS; PATIENTS; PELVIS; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MOCKUP; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.